Re: splitting common functions into a sepperate module

2007-03-08 Thread Bruno Desthuilliers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > On 8 mrt, 10:36, Bruno Desthuilliers > - wrapping the functions as methods of a class, passing the whole state >> as args to the class initializer. > I already considerate this one, but I don't like it because it is not > correct in terms of the object-oriented concept

Re: splitting common functions into a sepperate module

2007-03-08 Thread Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, jonkersbart wrote: >> - wrapping the functions as methods of a class, passing the whole state >> as args to the class initializer. > I already considerate this one, but I don't like it because it is not > correct in terms of the object-oriented concept. Why? I thought com

Re: splitting common functions into a sepperate module

2007-03-08 Thread jonkersbart
On 8 mrt, 10:36, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > > > Dear, > > > I have wrote a script and want to group some functions of the script > > in a separate modulo so that I can import the module in other scripts > > and use the same functions there.. > > > The problem is tha

Re: splitting common functions into a sepperate module

2007-03-08 Thread Bruno Desthuilliers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > Dear, > > I have wrote a script and want to group some functions of the script > in a separate modulo so that I can import the module in other scripts > and use the same functions there.. > > The problem is that the common functions need access to some global > varia

Re: splitting common functions into a sepperate module

2007-03-08 Thread Gabriel Genellina
En Thu, 08 Mar 2007 05:45:24 -0300, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > I have wrote a script and want to group some functions of the script > in a separate modulo so that I can import the module in other scripts > and use the same functions there.. > > The problem is that the common functions need ac