bhunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * The problem with the testcase, I believe, was the size of the file
> and the output pipe filling up, as Nick suggested. When run on a
> smaller file, with Jordan's suggestions, it works fine. With a larger
> file, it's necessary to do as Nick says. If the
Wow, everyone. Great comments. Thanks so much!
A few points on all of the above, just so I don't look too stupid:
* The problem with the testcase, I believe, was the size of the file
and the output pipe filling up, as Nick suggested. When run on a
smaller file, with Jordan's suggestions, it wo
bhunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I've used subprocess with 2.4 several times to execute a process, wait
> for it to finish, and then look at its output. Now I want to spawn
> the process separately, later check to see if it's finished, and if it
> is look at its output. I may want
On Nov 27, 4:30 am, Nick Craig-Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MonkeeSage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Couple of things. You should use poll() on the Popen instance, and
> > should check it explicitly against None (since a 0 return code,
> > meaning exit successfully, will be treated as a fa
MonkeeSage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Couple of things. You should use poll() on the Popen instance, and
> should check it explicitly against None (since a 0 return code,
> meaning exit successfully, will be treated as a false condition the
> same as None). Also, in your second example, you b
Hi Brian,
Couple of things. You should use poll() on the Popen instance, and
should check it explicitly against None (since a 0 return code,
meaning exit successfully, will be treated as a false condition the
same as None). Also, in your second example, you block the program
when you call readline
On Nov 26, 3:05 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> bhunter schrieb:
>
>
>
> > On Nov 26, 1:50 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> bhunter schrieb:
>
> >>> Hi,
> >>> I've used subprocess with 2.4 several times to execute a process, wait
> >>> for it to finish, and
bhunter schrieb:
> On Nov 26, 1:50 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> bhunter schrieb:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I've used subprocess with 2.4 several times to execute a process, wait
>>> for it to finish, and then look at its output. Now I want to spawn
>>> the process separately, la
On Nov 26, 1:50 pm, "Diez B. Roggisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> bhunter schrieb:
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I've used subprocess with 2.4 several times to execute a process, wait
> > for it to finish, and then look at its output. Now I want to spawn
> > the process separately, later check to see if i
>
> This is just the way I do it...as I said, there are probably some
> other people in the group who will have other opinions. By the way,
> your statement "I was hoping not to have to avoid that" means that you
> hoped to use threading...which I think is contradictory to what you
> meant.
>
> Mik
bhunter schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I've used subprocess with 2.4 several times to execute a process, wait
> for it to finish, and then look at its output. Now I want to spawn
> the process separately, later check to see if it's finished, and if it
> is look at its output. I may want to send a signal at
On Nov 26, 12:27 pm, bhunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've read that this sort of thing can be a pain. I'm sure someone will
> > post and have other views though. I have had some success using
> > Python's threading module though. There's a pretty good walkthrough
> > here (it uses wxPython i
> I've read that this sort of thing can be a pain. I'm sure someone will
> post and have other views though. I have had some success using
> Python's threading module though. There's a pretty good walkthrough
> here (it uses wxPython in its example):
>
> http://wiki.wxpython.org/LongRunningTasks
>
On Nov 26, 10:54 am, bhunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've used subprocess with 2.4 several times to execute a process, wait
> for it to finish, and then look at its output. Now I want to spawn
> the process separately, later check to see if it's finished, and if it
> is look at its ou
14 matches
Mail list logo
