Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Is there any reason not to change the behavior of the indices() method
> > so it gives indices that can be used in range (to give indices
> > corresponding to elements that would be extracted by a given slice)
> > *and* used as arguments for sl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there any reason not to change the behavior of the indices() method
> so it gives indices that can be used in range (to give indices
> corresponding to elements that would be extracted by a given slice)
> *and* used as arguments for slices so that the slice with the n
