Re: relation class

2009-04-26 Thread Aaron Brady
On Apr 24, 1:18 am, Aaron Brady wrote: > On Apr 22, 11:34 pm, Aaron Brady wrote: > > > On Apr 22, 11:52 am, Aaron Brady wrote: > > > > On Apr 22, 12:09 am, Chris Rebert wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Aaron Brady > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I think Python sh

Re: relation class

2009-04-23 Thread Aaron Brady
On Apr 22, 11:34 pm, Aaron Brady wrote: > On Apr 22, 11:52 am, Aaron Brady wrote: > > > On Apr 22, 12:09 am, Chris Rebert wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Aaron Brady wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > I think Python should have a relation class in the standard library. > > > > Fat

Re: relation class

2009-04-22 Thread Aaron Brady
On Apr 22, 11:52 am, Aaron Brady wrote: > On Apr 22, 12:09 am, Chris Rebert wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Aaron Brady wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I think Python should have a relation class in the standard library. > > > Fat chance. > > > Perhaps I'm not understanding "relation"

Re: relation class

2009-04-22 Thread Aaron Brady
On Apr 22, 12:09 am, Chris Rebert wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Aaron Brady wrote: > > Hi all, > > > I think Python should have a relation class in the standard library. > > Fat chance. > > Perhaps I'm not understanding "relation" correctly, but are you not > aware ofhttp://docs.pytho

Re: relation class

2009-04-21 Thread Chris Rebert
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Aaron Brady wrote: > Hi all, > > I think Python should have a relation class in the standard library. > Fat chance. Perhaps I'm not understanding "relation" correctly, but are you not aware of http://docs.python.org/library/sqlite3.html ? Cheers, Chris -- I have