On Dec 10, 12:22 pm, MRAB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 9, 10:12 pm, John Machin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 10, 8:53 am, Noah Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 9, 1:41 pm, John Machin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > A pattern that can validly be descr
On Dec 9, 10:12 pm, John Machin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 10, 8:53 am, Noah Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 9, 1:41 pm, John Machin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > A pattern that can validly be described as a "regular expression"
> > > cannot count and thus can't ma
On Dec 10, 8:53 am, Noah Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 9, 1:41 pm, John Machin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > A pattern that can validly be described as a "regular expression"
> > cannot count and thus can't match balanced parentheses. Some "RE"
> > engines provide a method of taggi
On Dec 9, 1:41 pm, John Machin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A pattern that can validly be described as a "regular expression"
> cannot count and thus can't match balanced parentheses. Some "RE"
> engines provide a method of tagging a sub-pattern so that a match must
> include balanced () (or [] or
On Dec 10, 8:13 am, Noah Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been trying to write a regular expression that identifies a
> block of text enclosed by (potentially nested) parentheses. I've found
> solutions using other regular expression engines (for example, my text
> editor, BBEdit, which
