Re: redundant importr

2005-04-05 Thread max(01)*
Peter Hansen wrote: max(01)* wrote: Peter Hansen wrote: No it doesn't. I thought I was clear, but I can reword it for you: the files are compiled *in-memory* and the results are never written to disk. > *if* they are compiled, where are they put, if the corresponding *.py files are on a non-write

Re: redundant importr

2005-04-04 Thread Peter Hansen
max(01)* wrote: Peter Hansen wrote: No it doesn't. I thought I was clear, but I can reword it for you: the files are compiled *in-memory* and the results are never written to disk. > *if* they are compiled, where are they put, if the corresponding *.py files are on a non-writeable directory? They

Re: redundant importr

2005-04-02 Thread max(01)*
Peter Hansen wrote: max(01)* wrote: Peter Hansen wrote: Not required except for performance reasons. If the .pyc files don't exist, the .py files are recompiled and the resulting bytecode is simply held in memory and not cached and the next startup will recompile all over again. but the other fil

Re: redundant importr

2005-04-01 Thread Peter Hansen
max(01)* wrote: Peter Hansen wrote: Not required except for performance reasons. If the .pyc files don't exist, the .py files are recompiled and the resulting bytecode is simply held in memory and not cached and the next startup will recompile all over again. but the other files *are* compiled, ri