Re: re-posting: web.py, incomplete

2006-03-04 Thread _wolf
ok, that does it! [EMAIL PROTECTED] a lot! sorry first of all for my adding to the confusion when i jumped to comment on that ``-u`` option thing---of course, **no -u option** means **buffered**, positively, so there is buffering and buffering problems, **with -u option** there is **no buffer**, s

Re: re-posting: web.py, incomplete

2006-03-03 Thread Magnus Lycka
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: > On 3 Mar 2006 04:01:44 -0800, "_wolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > declaimed the following in comp.lang.python: > > >>it does look like it, no? No, it looks the other way around: You have buffered output, and parts of your stdout never gets flushed. -u is not a problem, it's

Re: re-posting: web.py, incomplete

2006-03-03 Thread _wolf
it does look like it, no? but i don't---at least i think i don't. in my httpd conf it says ``AddHandler cgi-script .py``, and at the top of my script, ``#!/usr/local/bin/python``. standard, no ``-u`` here. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: re-posting: web.py, incomplete

2006-03-03 Thread Magnus Lycka
_wolf wrote: > then the output is :: > > Hello, oops! > Hello, oops! > <20 lines omitted/> > Hello, oops! > Hel Are you running Python unbuffered? I.e. python -u -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list