On 12/6/2012 11:50 AM, Matt wrote:
It works now. Steven and Alex, thanks for your help!
I ended up leaving sample.py and foo.py and bar.p the way they were, and in
__init__.py putting:
from foo import *
from bar import *
So my mistake was not importing the foo and bar modules into
sub_one/__
It works now. Steven and Alex, thanks for your help!
I ended up leaving sample.py and foo.py and bar.p the way they were, and in
__init__.py putting:
from foo import *
from bar import *
So my mistake was not importing the foo and bar modules into
sub_one/__init__.py.
I also see how the __all_
On Wed, 05 Dec 2012 20:58:46 -0800, Matt wrote:
> I have a directory structure that looks like this:
>
> sample.py
> sub_one/
> __init__.py # defines only the list __all__ = ['foo', 'bar']
> foo.py # defines the function in_foo()
> bar.py # defines the function in_bar()
On 6 Dec, 14:58, Matt wrote:
> I have a directory structure that looks like this:
>
> sample.py
> sub_one/
> __init__.py # defines only the list __all__ = ['foo', 'bar']
> foo.py # defines the function in_foo()
> bar.py # defines the function in_bar()
>
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Matt wrote:
> I have about 30 modules in my package (foos and bars) and I don't want 30
> lines at the top of each file that uses this package. What am I doing wrong?
Not necessarily wrong, but definitely something to query: WHY do you
have thirty modules in your
