[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ... When I first translated it to Python verbatim,
> the Python script took almost 30 secs to run.
> So far, the best I can do is 11.2 secs using this:
>
> from random import randrange
> from itertools import imap, repeat
> from operator import getitem, add, getslice
>
On Dec 13, 1:23 pm, Jakub Stolarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If all you need is the result here's simpler and more efficient code:
>
> from random import randrange
> sum = 100 * randrange(128)
> print "Sum is ", sum
>
> And the same in perl:
>
> my $sum = 100 * int(rand(128));
> print "Sum is $
On 13 Gru, 19:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There's got to be a simpler and more efficient way to do this.
> Can you help?
>
> Thanks,
> igor
If all you need is the result here's simpler and more efficient code:
from random import randrange
sum = 100 * randrange(128)
print "Sum is ", sum
And t
On Dec 13, 6:11 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> from random import randrange
> from itertools import imap, repeat
> from operator import getitem, add, getslice
>
> result = 0
> zeros = [0]*100
> for i in xrange (10):
> s = [chr(randrange(128))] * 1024
> starts = repeat(randrange(900), 1
On Dec 13, 2007 12:11 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First, let me admit that the test is pretty dumb (someone else
> suggested it :) but since I am new to Python, I am using it to learn
> how to write efficient code.
>
> my $sum = 0;
> foreach (1..10) {
> my $str = chr(rand(128)) x 1024
