On 6/3/2016 12:02 AM, Muhammad Ali wrote:
> On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 6:27:50 AM UTC+8, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
>> On 6/2/2016 2:03 PM, Joel Goldstick wrote:
>>> Although the OP is using Windows 7, according to recent articles,
>>> Ubuntu is teaming with MS for Windows 10 to include a bash shell,
On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 6:27:50 AM UTC+8, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
> On 6/2/2016 2:03 PM, Joel Goldstick wrote:
> > Although the OP is using Windows 7, according to recent articles,
> > Ubuntu is teaming with MS for Windows 10 to include a bash shell,
> > presumably with the package management o
On 6/2/2016 2:03 PM, Joel Goldstick wrote:
> Although the OP is using Windows 7, according to recent articles,
> Ubuntu is teaming with MS for Windows 10 to include a bash shell,
> presumably with the package management of Ubuntu (debian), with pip
> goodness and virtualenv and virtualenvwrapper.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Eric S. Johansson wrote:
> On 6/2/2016 12:38 PM, Wildman via Python-list wrote:
>> On Thu, 02 Jun 2016 04:22:45 -0700, Muhammad Ali wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I use windows regularly, however, I use linux for only my research work at
>>> supercomputer. In my researc
On 6/2/2016 12:38 PM, Wildman via Python-list wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Jun 2016 04:22:45 -0700, Muhammad Ali wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I use windows regularly, however, I use linux for only my research work at
>> supercomputer. In my research field (materials science) most of the scripts
>> are being writ
On Thu, 02 Jun 2016 04:22:45 -0700, Muhammad Ali wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use windows regularly, however, I use linux for only my research work at
> supercomputer. In my research field (materials science) most of the scripts
> are being written in python with linux based system. Could I installed suc
Others have mentioned Cygwin or the new subsystem. The other two options a
number of Python develops that I work use are to (1) install
vmware/virtualbox and run linux in a vm or (2) install the packaged
binaries, such as Anaconda from Continuum Analytics.
One issue I had when using cygwin was th
Deborah Martin writes:
> Try Cygwin at http://www.cygwin.com
>
Or use the new windows subsystem for linux:
https://blogs.windows.com/buildingapps/2016/03/30/run-bash-on-ubuntu-on-windows/
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Try Cygwin at http://www.cygwin.com
Regards,
Deborah
-Original Message-
From: Python-list
[mailto:python-list-bounces+deborah.martin=kognitio@python.org] On Behalf
Of Muhammad Ali
Sent: 02 June 2016 12:23
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Python on Windows with linux environment
On 2 June 2016 at 12:22, Muhammad Ali wrote:
> I use windows regularly, however, I use linux for only my research work at
> supercomputer. In my research field (materials science) most of the scripts
> are being written in python with linux based system. Could I installed such
> linux based pyt
On 11/25/2015 3:34 PM, francis funari wrote:
I have tried installing Python 3 on windows 10 it install OK but I do
not get Idle. When I type Idle in the interpreter nothing happen
Starting programs by typing their names into the interactive interpreter
does not work.
Use Start Menu | All App
In a message of Wed, 25 Nov 2015 20:34:01 +, francis funari writes:
>I have tried installing Python 3 on windows 10 it install OK but I do not get
>Idle. When I type Idle in the interpreter nothing happen can you send me a
>link to latest release of Python 3 with Idle that will run on windows
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 4:40 PM, babatunde akerele wrote:
> hello, i'm having problem coding and running python on my pc...i just
> started learning python last month in codeacademy.com but i've not
> been able to code offline 'cos i don't knw how to go abt installing
> the compiler and all that.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFnuK9dlWdk
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 1:40 PM, babatunde akerele wrote:
> hello, i'm having problem coding and running python on my pc...i just
> started learning python last month in codeacademy.com but i've not
> been able to code offline 'cos i don't knw how to go
"Tim Golden" wrote:
In general, you'll want to be using a mechanism such as pip:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/pip
which will look things up on PyPI so you can just do "pip install
newmodule".
And if you have a pip.bat from some Perl installation sitting before
python's Scripts dir in your
On 19/10/2012 15:23, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 19/10/2012 14:44, Tim Golden wrote:
>>
>> (In general, PyPI is the first place to look for Python packages).
>>
>>
>
> For the benefit of the OP and others this is worth reading on how to get
> Python packages from pypi that let you get Python package
[Could I suggest snipping some of the preceding replies unless you're
referring directly to them? Just leave enough to make the context clear]
[... attempts to find feedparser module for beginner's tutorial ...]
On 19/10/2012 15:12, graham wrote:
> Once again thanks to those that replied.
>
> Si
On 19/10/2012 14:44, Tim Golden wrote:
(In general, PyPI is the first place to look for Python packages).
For the benefit of the OP and others this is worth reading on how to get
Python packages from pypi that let you get Python packages from pypi
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4750806
On 19/10/2012 14:24, graham wrote:
On 16/10/2012 12:29, graham wrote:
Downloaded and installed Python 2.7.3 for windows (an XP machine).
Entered the Python interactive interpreter/command line and typed the
following:
>>>import feedparser
and I get the error message "No module named fee
On 19/10/2012 14:24, graham wrote:
> Python was installed in the subdirectory C:\Python27 with the file
> feedparser.py residing in C:\Python27\Lib\email.
>
> Setting the Windows environment variable (which did not previously
> exist) to C:\Python27\Lib\email allowed me to import feedparser
> succ
On Oct 19, 6:24 pm, graham wrote:
> On 16/10/2012 12:29, graham wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Downloaded and installed Python 2.7.3 for windows (an XP machine).
>
> > Entered the Python interactive interpreter/command line and typed the
> > following:
>
> > >>>import feedparser
>
> > and I
On 19/10/2012 14:24, graham wrote:
> Thanks to everyone who replied.
>
> Python was installed in the subdirectory C:\Python27 with the file
> feedparser.py residing in C:\Python27\Lib\email.
>
> Setting the Windows environment variable (which did not previously
> exist) to C:\Python27\Lib\email a
On 16/10/2012 12:29, graham wrote:
Downloaded and installed Python 2.7.3 for windows (an XP machine).
Entered the Python interactive interpreter/command line and typed the
following:
>>>import feedparser
and I get the error message "No module named feedparser".
There is a feedparser.py
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Marco Nawijn wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 1:29:23 PM UTC+2, graham wrote:
>> Downloaded and installed Python 2.7.3 for windows (an XP machine).
>>
>>
>>
>> Entered the Python interactive interpreter/command line and typed the
>>
>> following:
>>
>>
>>
>>
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 7:29 AM, graham wrote:
>
> Downloaded and installed Python 2.7.3 for windows (an XP machine).
>
> Entered the Python interactive interpreter/command line and typed the
> following:
>
> >>>import feedparser
>
> and I get the error message "No module named feedparser"
On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 1:29:23 PM UTC+2, graham wrote:
> Downloaded and installed Python 2.7.3 for windows (an XP machine).
>
>
>
> Entered the Python interactive interpreter/command line and typed the
>
> following:
>
>
>
> >>>import feedparser
>
>
>
> and I get the error mes
eware@python.org] On
Behalf Of Jerry Hill
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:43 PM
To: python-list (General)
Subject: Re: Weird behaviour re: Python on Windows
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Kevin Jing Qiu
wrote:
> I've been experiencing weird behavior of Python's os module on
Windo
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Kevin Jing Qiu
wrote:
> I've been experiencing weird behavior of Python's os module on Windows:
>
> Here's the environment:
> Box1: Running Windows 2003 Server with Apache+mod_python
> Box2: Running Windows 2003 Server with Zope/Plone and Z:\ mapped to D:\
> on Box
I've been experiencing weird behavior of Python's os module on Windows:
Here's the environment:
Box1: Running Windows 2003 Server with Apache+mod_python
Box2: Running Windows 2003 Server with Zope/Plone and Z:\ mapped to D:\
on Box1
It appears any os calls that deals with file/dir on the mapped d
> Anybody here that had the same problem and solved it?
Did you install the 32-bit or the 64-bit installer?
If the 64-bit installer, did you also install 32-bit or 64-bit
installers for iPython, PIL, and easy_install?
If you try to use 32-bit extensions or installers to locate a 64-bit
Python, t
On Feb 21, 10:09 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've written the following script based on information I have found on
> the web. The purpose of the script is to start an HTTP listener on
> the machine it's running on that will give status on a particular
> service running on that system. I've tr
Grant Edwards wrote:
> Definitely. Nobody does single .exe file windows programs
> anymore. A single-file installer is almost as easy.
>
uTorrent, Process Explorer or Media Player Classic are single .exe
windows programs.
Granted, most of them are under-150kb-works-of-arts, but MPC isn't (well
On 2006-02-03, Larry Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What would folks suggest is the easiest way to package it to run on
>> other windows PCs?
Like the man said, my vote is for py2exe + inno-setup
>> I would love a single .exe file that would run without ANY OTHER FILES
>> even if it was 50
Simon Faulkner wrote:
> I've just written my first (simple) WxPython program - yy!
>
> What would folks suggest is the easiest way to package it to run on
> other windows PCs?
>
> I would love a single .exe file that would run without ANY OTHER FILES
> even if it was 50 Mb!
>
> TIA
>
>
> S
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>I would love a single .exe file that would run without ANY OTHER FILES
>>even if it was 50 Mb!
>
>
> You should look at pyinstaller
> (http://pyinstaller.hpcf.upr.edu/cgi-bin/trac.cgi), as far as I know
> the only py->exe compiler that makes single file executables for
> I would love a single .exe file that would run without ANY OTHER FILES
> even if it was 50 Mb!
You should look at pyinstaller
(http://pyinstaller.hpcf.upr.edu/cgi-bin/trac.cgi), as far as I know
the only py->exe compiler that makes single file executables for
windows. You may even bundle additio
Simon Faulkner wrote:
> I've just written my first (simple) WxPython program - yy!
>
> What would folks suggest is the easiest way to package it to run on
> other windows PCs?
I can't tell for sure since I do not use Windows, but I think Py2Exe is
what you're looking for.
--
bruno desthui
Simon Faulkner wrote:
> I've just written my first (simple) WxPython program - yy!
>
> What would folks suggest is the easiest way to package it to run on
> other windows PCs?
>
> I would love a single .exe file that would run without ANY OTHER FILES
> even if it was 50 Mb!
>
> TIA
>
>
>
38 matches
Mail list logo
