On May 4, 11:43 pm, Duncan Booth wrote:
> In case it isn't obvious why I might be subscribed but emails turned off, I
> read mailing lists like that through gmane in which case I still need to
> sign up to the list to post but definitely don't want to receive emails.
This. I was surprised to sudd
james hedley wrote:
> There's also an allegation, which I am not making myself at this point
> - only describing its nature, that a person may have lifted data from
> the original mail server without authorisation and used it to recreate
> the mailing list on a different machine. *If* that were t
By the way, there's a lot more to say on this, which I'll cover another time.
There are arguments for and against what's happened; at this stage I'm just
trying to flag up that there is *not* unanimity and we are not just carrying on
as normal.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-
On Thursday, 3 May 2012 12:52:36 UTC+1, alex23 wrote:
> Anyone else following the apparent hijack of the pyjs project from its
> lead developer?
Yes, me. The guy now in control got the owner of the domain name to turn it
over to him, which is probably ok legally, but he had no public mandate or
On 5/4/2012 12:52 AM, John O'Hagan wrote:
Just read the thread on pyjamas-dev. Even without knowing anything about the
lead-up to the coup, its leader's linguistic contortions trying to justify it
And what is the name of the miscreant, so we know who to have nothing to
with?
--
Terry Jan Re
On Thu, 3 May 2012 04:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
alex23 wrote:
> Anyone else following the apparent hijack of the pyjs project from its
> lead developer?
> --
Just read the thread on pyjamas-dev. Even without knowing anything about the
lead-up to the coup, its leader's linguistic contortions trying to j
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 5:52 AM, alex23 wrote:
> Anyone else following the apparent hijack of the pyjs project from its
> lead developer?
I've been following it but quietly since I don't use pyjs. It
surprises me that nobody is talking much about it outside of the
thread on pyjamas-dev. Seems to
>Anyone else following the apparent hijack of the pyjs project from its
>lead developer?
Not beyond what the lead developer has been posting on the newsgroup,
no. Still a damn shame, though. What happens when you have an
unresolvable ideological seperation like that is you branch, not take
over.
