2008/9/24 Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> With the mod/mod1 mixup fixed, you do not need the update function.
> mod.a = 20
> should do the same thing.
I was assuming that the update function was just to illustrate the
access problem the writer was having. I think the chances are the
problem i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've a problem updating my variable in a module.
In my main program, I call a function from mod1 to update a variable of mod1
As soon as I update this varibale, I check it back in the mail program
but it the variable from mod1 does not get updated.
main Program:
>I take it you do have a *really* good reason to use a global?
Please suggest some way other than using global. I want to get rid of it
--
Regards,
Rajat
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Thanks Tim,
Yes, I mean 'mod' only.
But this does not work for me
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Tim Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/9/24 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've a problem updating my variable in a module.
> >
> > In my main program, I call a function from mod1 to u
2008/9/24 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I've a problem updating my variable in a module.
>
> In my main program, I call a function from mod1 to update a variable of mod1
> As soon as I update this varibale, I check it back in the mail program but
> it the variable from mod1 does not get updated.
