On 4/28/2017 1:01 PM, allen wade wrote:
is there a way to install python on a thumb drive
Check http://portablepython.com/
that does not require an
administrator's password? I have to use public computers and store all my
applications to the thumb drive, using the Portable Apps Platform to
Well I'm not paying anybody anything. I'm giving USB sticks for free because I
got them for free from our sponsor :) Name and email I need to be able to know
where to send them, or you know some easier ways for that ?
And thanks for your suggestion but I'm putting my free time where I want while
On 1/1/2011 3:59 PM, Perica Zivkovic wrote:
when those versions of Portable Python were published, they were the
latest available versions of Python.
2.6.1: December 2008; 3.0.1: February 2009
Unfortunately I did not had time
to update them since the last release.
If you have not done any
Hi Terry,
when those versions of Portable Python were published, they were the latest
available versions of Python. Unfortunately I did not had time to update them
since the last release.
regards,
Perica
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 1/1/2011 10:14 AM, Perica Zivkovic wrote:
All,
Portable Python challenge - round 1 has started !
Answer one simple question and you can win 4GB USB fingerprint
drive.
In exchange for name and email...
The question: "What is the exact date (day month and year) of the first
Portable Python
Is there any difference in functionality between standard Python pack
and portable Python?
It is not so easy to install third party modules for portable Python...
Why standard Python pack installation requires reboot after installation?
It is not true for all operating systems. At least under
This is a great piece of work. Thanks.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, asit
wrote:
> from socket import *
I think I'd make it a policy not to help with any scripts that contain
wildcard imports.
> status={0:"open",10049:"address not available",10061:"closed",
> 10060:"timeout",10056:"already connected",10035:"filtered",11001:"IP
> no
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 2:33 PM, asit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this the o/p
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/hack$ python portscan.py 59.93.128.10 10 20
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "portscan.py", line 33, in
>print str(port) + " : " + scan(ip,port,timeout)
> File "portscan.py", line
Am Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:33:33 -0700 schrieb asit:
> On Oct 24, 11:18 pm, "Jerry Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:42 PM, asit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I code in both windows and Linux. As python is portable, the o/p
>> > should be same in both cases. But why the f
On Oct 24, 11:18 pm, "Jerry Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:42 PM, asit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I code in both windows and Linux. As python is portable, the o/p
> > should be same in both cases. But why the following code is perfect in
> > windows but error one
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:42 PM, asit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I code in both windows and Linux. As python is portable, the o/p
> should be same in both cases. But why the following code is perfect in
> windows but error one in Linux ???
What error message do you get in linux? How are you r
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:42:21 -0700, asit wrote:
> I code in both windows and Linux. As python is portable, the o/p should
> be same in both cases. But why the following code is perfect in windows
> but error one in Linux ???
So what *is* the error on Linux!?
> def scan(ip,port,timeout):
>
It was Sun, 4 Mar 2007 14:09:20 +0500, when Bart Van Loon wrote:
> It was Sun, 4 Mar 2007 02:38:58 +0500, when Bart Van Loon wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm looking for a portable (FreeBSD and Linux) way of getting typical
>> ifconfig information into Python.
>
> After lots of trial and error (I'm prof
It was Sun, 4 Mar 2007 02:38:58 +0500, when Bart Van Loon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for a portable (FreeBSD and Linux) way of getting typical
> ifconfig information into Python.
After lots of trial and error (I'm proficient in C at all), I puzzled
togehter the following. It works (at least
It was 3 Mar 2007 18:43:57 -0800, when MonkeeSage wrote:
> Bart,
>
> Can you try this and let us know if it works for FreeBSD?
thanks for you suggestions!
> import socket, fcntl, struct
>
> def _ifinfo(sock, addr, ifname):
> iface = struct.pack('256s', ifname[:15])
> info = fcntl.ioctl(s
Bart,
Can you try this and let us know if it works for FreeBSD?
import socket, fcntl, struct
def _ifinfo(sock, addr, ifname):
iface = struct.pack('256s', ifname[:15])
info = fcntl.ioctl(sock.fileno(), addr, iface)
if addr == 0x8927:
hwaddr = []
for char in info[18:24
On Mar 3, 7:17 pm, "MonkeeSage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm pretty sure the offsets would be different for BSD
Then again, mabye not.
http://freebsd.active-venture.com/FreeBSD-srctree/newsrc/compat/linux/linux_ioctl.h.html
Regards,
Jordan
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-
On Mar 3, 3:38 pm, Bart Van Loon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking for a portable (FreeBSD and Linux) way of getting typical
> ifconfig information into Python.
Here's a pure python version of the C extension, based on the recipes
you posted. In this version, the 'addr' key will not exist f
Stef,
I never used Python4Delphi but I added it to the
list-of-things-to-examine :)
FOR ALL: I created google group for Portable Python
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/portablepython and posted few items
for discussion there :) Please if you have ideas/suggestions post it
there!
grtz
Perica
> and something like Enthought edition will be there :) with even more
> packages and options :) at least that is my goal for the future :) But
> I must say I will also always be carefull with size of the distro :)
> thats also important right? :)
Coming from MatLab, that's not the most important t
yes on both last messages :)
More platforms will be included if there is enoug people interested in
that.
and something like Enthought edition will be there :) with even more
packages and options :) at least that is my goal for the future :) But
I must say I will also always be carefull with size
perica> but this is first release and I have big plans ;)
Including maybe other platforms than Windows?
Skip
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Right now there is not a big difference with Movable Python.
> - Smaller size but less libraries in default package
> - Portable Python comes with django
> - Uses SciTE not SPE
>
> but this is first release and I have big plans ;)
>
any plans for a something like the En
Right now there is not a big difference with Movable Python.
- Smaller size but less libraries in default package
- Portable Python comes with django
- Uses SciTE not SPE
but this is first release and I have big plans ;)
grtz
Perica
Steve Holden wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi there,
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I would like to announce the *first* beta release of the Portable
> Python 1.0 beta. From today Portable Python website is also online and
> you can find it on the location www.PortablePython.com.
>
> About:
> Portable Python is a Python programming langua
26 matches
Mail list logo
