Jean-Paul Calderone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >For jobs which require interactivity ie send input, receive output,
> >send input, receive output, ... it doesn't work well. There isn't a
> >good cross platform solution for this yet. pyexpect works well under
> >unix and is hopefully being porte
On Fri, 02 May 2008 06:30:03 -0500, Nick Craig-Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brendan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 02 May 2008 13:25:55 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> URL:http://docs.python.org/lib/module-subprocess.html
Awesome. This is exactly what I was hoping existed.
subproc
Brendan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 02 May 2008 13:25:55 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> > URL:http://docs.python.org/lib/module-subprocess.html
>
> Awesome. This is exactly what I was hoping existed.
subprocess works well for spawn process, send input, receive output,
read exit c
On Fri, 02 May 2008 13:25:55 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> URL:http://docs.python.org/lib/module-subprocess.html
Awesome. This is exactly what I was hoping existed.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Brendan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there an actual portable means of asynchronously spawning a
> process and getting a handle to it, being able to write stdin and
> read stdout, or does everyone just write their own wrapper for fork
> and spawn?
You're looking for the 'subprocess' mo
