Re: persistent deque version 4

2008-05-24 Thread Gabriel Genellina
En Thu, 22 May 2008 12:20:56 -0300, inhahe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > I thought about the fact that a decorator is merely syntactic sugar, so it > shouldn't have any closure magic that I can't make myself, and I realized > that I could have done it the following way: > > def makefunc(func): >

Re: persistent deque version 4

2008-05-22 Thread inhahe
"inhahe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 4. can someone tell me if the way i'm using the decorator is sane? i've > never used decorators before. it just seems ridiculous to a) define a > lambda that just throws away the parameter, and b) define a meaningless >