In article <256926de-e175-4fa2-aa24-dbd5f9675...@u20g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>,
sebastian.no...@googlemail.com wrote:
>On Feb 20, 8:13=A0pm, Gary Herron wrote:
>>
>> Here's a thought: =A0Consider the subprocess module. =A0 It can do thefor=
>k
>> and any necessary pipes and can do so in an OS ind
On Feb 20, 8:13 pm, Gary Herron wrote:
> Here's a thought: Consider the subprocess module. It can do thefork
> and any necessary pipes and can do so in an OS independent way. It
> might make you life much easier.
As far as i know the subprocess module provides only functionality for
running
Sebastian Noack wrote:
I have figured out that, you have to close the writing end in the child
process, which is reading from the pipe. Otherwise the underlying pipe
is not going to be closed when the parent process is closing its
writing end. This has nothing to do with Python itself. I have tri
I have figured out that, you have to close the writing end in the child
process, which is reading from the pipe. Otherwise the underlying pipe
is not going to be closed when the parent process is closing its
writing end. This has nothing to do with Python itself. I have tried
plain C and there it i