On 1/18/2014 3:50 AM, Peter Otten wrote:
Unlike `&` `and` cannot be overridden (*),
(*) I assume overriding would collide with short-cutting of boolean
expressions.
Yes. 'and' could be called a 'control-flow operator', but in Python it
is not a functional operator.
A functional binary op
Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
>John Ladasky wrote:
>
>> On Friday, January 17, 2014 6:16:28 PM UTC-8, duncan smith wrote:
>>
>>> >>> a = np.arange(10)
>>> >>> c = np.where((2 < a) & (a < 7))
>>> >>> c
>>> (array([3, 4, 5, 6]),)
>>
>> Nice! Thanks!
>>
>> Now, why does the multiple co
John Ladasky wrote:
> On Friday, January 17, 2014 6:16:28 PM UTC-8, duncan smith wrote:
>
>> >>> a = np.arange(10)
>> >>> c = np.where((2 < a) & (a < 7))
>> >>> c
>> (array([3, 4, 5, 6]),)
>
> Nice! Thanks!
>
> Now, why does the multiple comparison fail, if you happen to know?
2 < a < 7
i
On Friday, January 17, 2014 6:16:28 PM UTC-8, duncan smith wrote:
> >>> a = np.arange(10)
> >>> c = np.where((2 < a) & (a < 7))
> >>> c
> (array([3, 4, 5, 6]),)
Nice! Thanks!
Now, why does the multiple comparison fail, if you happen to know?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pyth
On 18/01/14 01:51, John Ladasky wrote:
Hi folks,
I am awaiting my approval to join the numpy-discussion mailing list, at
scipy.org. I realize that would be the best place to ask my question.
However, numpy is so widely used, I figure that someone here would be able to
help.
I like to use n
