[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there a stand-alone version of python out there that I can package
> with my scripts so that I don't have to bother with something like
> py2exe?
why not just ship the standard python interpreter with your applications?
just make a copy of the c:\python24 (or 25) in
Robert Kern wrote:
> I think he wants a no-install (or, perhaps more accurately,
> simply-unzip-to-install) version of the interpreter that doesn't
> need to touch the Windows registry or copy DLLs to system
> locations. py2exe builds such a thing (or nearly so) for the
> application itself, if i
Bjoern Schliessmann wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Is there a stand-alone version of python out there that I can
>> package with my scripts so that I don't have to bother with
>> something like py2exe?
>
> Isn't this the exact intention of py2exe?
I think he wants a no-install (or, perha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> Is there a stand-alone version of python out there that I can package
> with my scripts so that I don't have to bother with something like
> py2exe?
Yes, google for "movable Python".
Regards,
Martin
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there a stand-alone version of python out there that I can
> package with my scripts so that I don't have to bother with
> something like py2exe?
Isn't this the exact intention of py2exe?
Regards,
Björn
--
BOFH excuse #247:
Due to Federal Budget problems we hav
