Thank you guys for your replies.
I've just realized that there was no memory leak and it was just my
mistake to think so. I've almost disappointed with my favorite
programming language before addressing the problem. Actually the app
consume as much memory as it should and I've just miscalculated
Bryan Olson wrote:
> In Python 2.5, each thread will be allocated
>
> thread.stack_size()
>
> bytes of stack address space. Note that address space is
> not physical memory, nor even virtual memory. On modern
> operating systems, the memory gets allocated as needed,
> and 150 threads is not
Gabriel Genellina wrote:
> At Sunday 22/10/2006 20:31, Roman Petrichev wrote:
>
>> I've just faced with very nasty memory consumption problem.
>> I have a multythreaded app with 150 threads which use the only and the
>> same function - through urllib2 it just gets the web page's html code
>> and a
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> How much stack space gets allocated for 150 threads?
In Python 2.5, each thread will be allocated
thread.stack_size()
bytes of stack address space. Note that address space is
not physical memory, nor even virtual memory. On modern
operating systems, the memo
Roman Petrichev wrote:
> Hi folks.
> I've just faced with very nasty memory consumption problem.
> I have a multythreaded app with 150 threads
[...]
>
> The test app code:
>
>
> Q = Queue.Queue()
> for i in rez: #rez length - 5000
> Q.put(i)
>
>
> def checker():
> while True:
>
Roman Petrichev:
> Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>> How much stack space gets allocated for 150 threads?
> Actually I don't know. How can I get to know this?
On Linux, each thread will often be allocated 10 megabytes of stack.
This can be viewed and altered with the ulimit command.
Neil
-
At Sunday 22/10/2006 20:31, Roman Petrichev wrote:
I've just faced with very nasty memory consumption problem.
I have a multythreaded app with 150 threads which use the only and the
same function - through urllib2 it just gets the web page's html code
and assigns it to local variable. On the nex
Roman Petrichev wrote:
> try:
> url = Q.get()
> except Queue.Empty:
> break
This code will never raise the Queue.Empty exception. Only a
non-blocking get does:
url = Q.get(block=False)
As mentioned before you should post working code if you expect peo
Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 03:31:28 +0400, Roman Petrichev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> declaimed the following in comp.lang.python:
>
>> Hi folks.
>> I've just faced with very nasty memory consumption problem.
>> I have a multythreaded app with 150 threads which use the only and the
