On Oct 29, 10:08 am, Adam Tauno Williams
wrote:
> No, I don't think so. You're asking the module to over generalize
> behavior. Reaping of the child is important, and that the child needs
> to be reaped may matter to the master child (why? did something go
> wrong?).
And such information is made
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:12:19 -0400
> Neal Becker wrote:
>> Seems multiprocessing doesn't behave well with signals:
>> [...]
>
> By the way, could you post an issue on the tracker with instructions on
> how to reproduce (including OS)?
>
> Thanks
>
> Antoine.
http://bug
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:12:19 -0400
Neal Becker wrote:
> Seems multiprocessing doesn't behave well with signals:
> [...]
By the way, could you post an issue on the tracker with instructions on
how to reproduce (including OS)?
Thanks
Antoine.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-l
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 07:31 -0700, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
> On Oct 29, 10:08 am, Adam Tauno Williams
> wrote:
> > signal handler to do something smart in the case of a "-15" [for which
> > there isn't really a thread equivalent - can you sent a SystemV style
> > signal to an individual thread
On Oct 29, 10:08 am, Adam Tauno Williams
wrote:
> signal handler to do something smart in the case of a "-15" [for which
> there isn't really a thread equivalent - can you sent a SystemV style
> signal to an individual thread in a process? I don't think so.]
Yes. pthread_kill(P)
Jean-Paul
--
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:08:01 -0400
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>
> No, I don't think so. You're asking the module to over generalize
> behavior. Reaping of the child is important, and that the child needs
> to be reaped may matter to the master child (why? did something go
> wrong?). Silently r
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 08:39 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 08:12 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> >> Seems multiprocessing doesn't behave well with signals:
> >> -
> >> from multiprocessing import Pool
> >> import time
> >> def sleep (dummy):
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 08:12 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
>> Seems multiprocessing doesn't behave well with signals:
>> -
>> from multiprocessing import Pool
>> import time
>> def sleep (dummy):
>> time.sleep (10)
>> if __name__ == '__main__':
>> pool = Poo
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 08:12 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> Seems multiprocessing doesn't behave well with signals:
> -
> from multiprocessing import Pool
> import time
> def sleep (dummy):
> time.sleep (10)
> if __name__ == '__main__':
> pool = Pool (processes=2)
> result = po
