Simon Brunning wrote:
>> Are there news about the impossibility of redistributing msvcr71.ddl
>> with own stand-alone application written in python for who doesn't have
>> MSVC7 license?
>
> Last I heard the consensus was that it's OK to distribute msvcr71.ddl.
> But IANAL, and neither is anyone e
On 2/28/07, Konte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there news about the impossibility of redistributing msvcr71.ddl
> with own stand-alone application written in python for who doesn't have
> MSVC7 license?
Last I heard the consensus was that it's OK to distribute msvcr71.ddl.
But IANAL, and neith
robert wrote:
> hmm, yet msvcrt4 is obviously preinstalled on each Windows - and its in
> Windows Update Process. Its tagged: "4.20 - OS use only. DO NOT
> DISTRIBUTE")
> Think, in principle its possible to compile against that with
> VS2003/2005... ?
> ( think msvcrt4 is not delivered extra even
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> robert wrote:
>
> codecs are in python24.dll, mscvr71, mfc71 and all are not.
> However, they are not in core - the operating system demand-pages code,
> loading into core memory only what is being used. So if you don't use
> the codecs, they are not loaded into core.
>
robert wrote:
> For me the great great problem with Python2.4's lib geometry was that
> the size of distributable app installers swelled suddenly by many megs
> with msvcr71.dll and mfc71 and codecs in core and all.
codecs are in python24.dll, mscvr71, mfc71 and all are not.
However, they are not
