On 02/05/10 19:53, Wanderer wrote:
Which is the more accepted way to compose method names nounVerb or
verbNoun?
For example voltageGet or getVoltage? getVoltage sounds more normal,
but voltageGet is more like voltage.Get. I seem to mix them and I
should probably pick one way and stick with it.
On 05-Feb-10 14:53 PM, Wanderer wrote:
Which is the more accepted way to compose method names nounVerb or
verbNoun?
For example voltageGet or getVoltage? getVoltage sounds more normal,
but voltageGet is more like voltage.Get. I seem to mix them and I
should probably pick one way and stick with i
On Feb 5, 5:21 pm, Wanderer wrote:
> On Feb 5, 4:53 pm, Chris Rebert wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Wanderer wrote:
> > > On Feb 5, 3:26 pm, Chris Rebert wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Wanderer
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > Which is the more accepted way to compose
On Feb 5, 3:36 pm, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Steven D'Aprano
>
> wrote:
> > For instance, if getting or setting the voltage is an expensive
> > operation, you don't want to fool the user into thinking it is a cheap
> > attribute access.
>
> I strongly disagree with thi
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:26:38 -0800, Chris Rebert wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Wanderer
>> wrote:
>>> Which is the more accepted way to compose method names nounVerb or
>>> verbNoun?
>>>
>>> For example voltageGet or getVoltage
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:26:38 -0800, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Wanderer
> wrote:
>> Which is the more accepted way to compose method names nounVerb or
>> verbNoun?
>>
>> For example voltageGet or getVoltage? getVoltage sounds more normal,
>> but voltageGet is more like
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:53:08 -0800, Wanderer wrote:
> Which is the more accepted way to compose method names nounVerb or
> verbNoun?
>
> For example voltageGet or getVoltage? getVoltage sounds more normal,
+0.5 for getVoltage
+1 get_voltage
-1 for voltageGet or voltage_get
> but
> voltageGe
On Feb 5, 4:53 pm, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Wanderer wrote:
> > On Feb 5, 3:26 pm, Chris Rebert wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Wanderer wrote:
> >> > Which is the more accepted way to compose method names nounVerb or
> >> > verbNoun?
>
> >> > For examp
* Wanderer:
On Feb 5, 3:26 pm, Chris Rebert wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Wanderer wrote:
Which is the more accepted way to compose method names nounVerb or
verbNoun?
For example voltageGet or getVoltage? getVoltage sounds more normal,
but voltageGet is more like voltage.Get. I seem
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Wanderer wrote:
> On Feb 5, 3:26 pm, Chris Rebert wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Wanderer wrote:
>> > Which is the more accepted way to compose method names nounVerb or
>> > verbNoun?
>>
>> > For example voltageGet or getVoltage? getVoltage sounds more
On Feb 5, 3:26 pm, Chris Rebert wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Wanderer wrote:
> > Which is the more accepted way to compose method names nounVerb or
> > verbNoun?
>
> > For example voltageGet or getVoltage? getVoltage sounds more normal,
> > but voltageGet is more like voltage.Get. I
Wanderer wrote:
Which is the more accepted way to compose method names nounVerb or
verbNoun?
For example voltageGet or getVoltage? getVoltage sounds more normal,
but voltageGet is more like voltage.Get. I seem to mix them and I
should probably pick one way and stick with it.
I would use the 'n
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Wanderer wrote:
> Which is the more accepted way to compose method names nounVerb or
> verbNoun?
>
> For example voltageGet or getVoltage? getVoltage sounds more normal,
> but voltageGet is more like voltage.Get. I seem to mix them and I
> should probably pick one
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Wanderer wrote:
> Which is the more accepted way to compose method names nounVerb or
> verbNoun?
>
> For example voltageGet or getVoltage? getVoltage sounds more normal,
> but voltageGet is more like voltage.Get. I seem to mix them and I
> should probably pick one w
14 matches
Mail list logo