On Sep 22, 10:02 am, Al Kabaila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are several packages for matrix algebra. I tried Numeric, numpy and
> numarray. All three are very good, but each uses different syntax.
That argument might have been valid 3 years ago, but as already said
by others, Numeric and Num
On Sep 22, 4:02 am, Al Kabaila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Is there any interest in matrix algebra "for the masses" (I mean interest
> in a wrapper for a subset of functions of the packages with a unified
> simple syntax)?
I wouldn't since I do pretty advanced stuff and I'm happy to use numpy
On Sep 22, 11:32 am, "Tim Leslie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no need for a wrapper. Both numarray and Numeric have been
> deprecated in favour of numpy, so numpy is the only one you need to
> use. Numpy should have all the tools you need. If you find something
> missing, there's a good c
Tim Leslie wrote:
> There is no need for a wrapper. Both numarray and Numeric have been
> deprecated in favour of numpy.
Well, some years ago I looked for a matrix package. At that time it looked
that numarray was the end of it all - it had a clean syntax, an active
developer team. It looked to
On Sep 22, 4:02 am, Al Kabaila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a very active newsgroup that incudes such giants as Frederik Lundh
He looks rather small to me in this picture:
http://www.python.org/~guido/confpix/flundh-2.jpg
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Al Kabaila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My OS is Linux (openSUSE 10.3) and my interest in retirement is Python
> applications to Structural Analysis of Civil Engineering structures,
> currently in 2 dimensions only (under GPL). Modern Structural Analysis is
