Jorge Godoy napisał(a):
>>Bad idea. You may accidentally break some libraries that depend on ASCII
>>being default & standard.
>
> And what would those produce as output when fed with unicode data? How would
> they handle this input? IMVHO nothing should rely on having a standard
> charset as i
Jarek Zgoda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bad idea. You may accidentally break some libraries that depend on ASCII
> being default & standard.
And what would those produce as output when fed with unicode data? How would
they handle this input? IMVHO nothing should rely on having a standard
char
Nikola Skoric wrote:
> Is there a way of making 'utf-8' default codec for the whole program, so
> I don't have to do .encode('utf-8') every time I print out a string?
Explicit is better than implicit (so setting up a default codec is
considered bad practice). However, you could wrap an output de
Nikola Skoric napisał(a):
> Is there a way of making 'utf-8' default codec for the whole program, so
> I don't have to do .encode('utf-8') every time I print out a string?
Bad idea. You may accidentally break some libraries that depend on ASCII
being default & standard.
--
Jarek Zgoda
http://j
