Re: logging via SocketHandler and TCPserver

2008-07-15 Thread Larry Bates
Rob Wolfe wrote: Larry Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Can multiple applications send SocketHandler logging records to the same socket server on the same port simultaneously? Of course they can. Server can accept requests from many clients. You have used `SocketServer.ThreadingTCPServer`.

Re: logging via SocketHandler and TCPserver

2008-07-15 Thread Rob Wolfe
Larry Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can multiple applications send SocketHandler logging records to the > same socket server on the same port simultaneously? Of course they can. Server can accept requests from many clients. You have used `SocketServer.ThreadingTCPServer`. That server for

Re: logging via SocketHandler and TCPserver

2008-07-15 Thread Larry Bates
Vinay Sajip wrote: On Jul 14, 11:16 pm, Larry Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Vinay, Thanks for your detailed explanation, but IMHO your suggested solution is almost the opposite (right idea wrong direction) of what I'm looking for. Hypothetical setup: application1 - SocketHandlerloggingturn

Re: logging via SocketHandler and TCPserver

2008-07-15 Thread Vinay Sajip
On Jul 14, 11:16 pm, Larry Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Vinay, > > Thanks for your detailed explanation, but IMHO your suggested solution is > almost > the opposite (right idea wrong direction) of what I'm looking for. > Hypothetical > setup: > > application1 - SocketHandlerloggingturned o

Re: logging via SocketHandler and TCPserver

2008-07-14 Thread Larry Bates
Vinay Sajip wrote: On Jul 13, 9:25 pm, Larry Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Every time I look at theloggingmodule (up until now) I've given up and continue to use my home-grown logger that I've been using for years. I'm not giving up this time ;-) I find that I REALLY need to be able to mon

Re: logging via SocketHandler and TCPserver

2008-07-14 Thread Vinay Sajip
On Jul 13, 9:25 pm, Larry Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Every time I look at theloggingmodule (up until now) I've given up and > continue to use my home-grown logger that I've been using for years. I'm not > giving up this time ;-) > > I find that I REALLY need to be able to monitor LOTS of