Re: json vs. simplejson

2009-05-13 Thread Thomas Heller
Ned Deily schrieb: > In article <76vs9tf1f6c5...@mid.individual.net>, > Thomas Heller wrote: >> Diez B. Roggisch schrieb: >> > Thomas Heller wrote: >> >> Python 2.6 contains the json module, which I thought was the renamed (and >> >> improved?) simplejson module that also works on older Python ve

Re: json vs. simplejson

2009-05-13 Thread Ned Deily
In article <76vs9tf1f6c5...@mid.individual.net>, Thomas Heller wrote: > Diez B. Roggisch schrieb: > > Thomas Heller wrote: > >> Python 2.6 contains the json module, which I thought was the renamed (and > >> improved?) simplejson module that also works on older Python versions. > >> > >> However,

Re: json vs. simplejson

2009-05-13 Thread Thomas Heller
Diez B. Roggisch schrieb: > Thomas Heller wrote: > >> Python 2.6 contains the json module, which I thought was the renamed (and >> improved?) simplejson module that also works on older Python versions. >> >> However, it seems the json is a lot slower than simplejson. >> This little test, run on P

Re: json vs. simplejson

2009-05-13 Thread Diez B. Roggisch
Thomas Heller wrote: > Python 2.6 contains the json module, which I thought was the renamed (and > improved?) simplejson module that also works on older Python versions. > > However, it seems the json is a lot slower than simplejson. > This little test, run on Python 2.6.2 and WinXP shows a drama