On Nov 10, 10:27 am, "Colin J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Driscoll wrote:
> > On Nov 8, 1:35 pm, azrael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> whoever I ask, everyone tells me when it come to python and GUI-s and
> >> that there is the best way to use WX. I am browsing for the 10th time
>
Mike Driscoll wrote:
On Nov 8, 1:35�pm, azrael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
whoever I ask, everyone tells me when it come to python and GUI-s and
that there is the best way to use WX. I am browsing for the 10th time
during the last year and I can still not bealive that there is not one
project to
On Nov 8, 1:35 pm, azrael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> whoever I ask, everyone tells me when it come to python and GUI-s and
> that there is the best way to use WX. I am browsing for the 10th time
> during the last year and I can still not bealive that there is not one
> project to make gui-buildin
On 9 Nov 2008 19:08:35 GMT, Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Phil Thompson wrote:
>
>>> Thay aren't claiming that Qt itself is governed by the GPL, what they
>>> are claiming is that the 'Qt Open Source License' permits you to use it
>>> for development of "Open Source software governed b
On Sunday 09 November 2008 20:08, Duncan Booth wrote:
> So are the references to 'Qt Open Source License' on the website
> misleading?
It depends on whether you assume that there's a separate license by that
name. In practice, it's a placeholder for the licenses it's available under:
"The Open S
It would be rally great if wingIDE would have integrated controls for
wxPython.This would be really great.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Phil Thompson wrote:
>> Thay aren't claiming that Qt itself is governed by the GPL, what they
>> are claiming is that the 'Qt Open Source License' permits you to use it
>> for development of "Open Source software governed by the GNU General
>> Public License versions 2 and 3". I believe they can m
Ben Finney wrote:
Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In effect this means that if you want to develop any commercial
software with Qt you have to buy the license in advance (even if all
you want is to knock together some proof-of-concept) and you are
also permanently locked out from incl
On Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:15:42 -0500, Kevin Walzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Phil Thompson wrote:
>
>>
>> The only "additional" restrictions are those imposed by the *commercial*
>> license. As I said before, those restrictions are intended to discourage
>> commercial developers from avoiding pa
Phil Thompson wrote:
The only "additional" restrictions are those imposed by the *commercial*
license. As I said before, those restrictions are intended to discourage
commercial developers from avoiding paying license costs during their
development phase.
Is this interpretation of Qt's lice
On 9 Nov 2008 14:40:22 GMT, Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Ben Finney wrote:
>
>>> It is a novel interpretation of the GPL. Qt Software have every
>>> right to impose this sort of condition, but it makes me want to
>>> avoid them.
>>
>> No, they have no such right to interpret the GPL t
On Sunday 09 November 2008 13:45, Ben Finney wrote:
> Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Mr.SpOOn wrote:
>> > What's the problem with qt licence?
>>
>> "You must purchase a Qt Commercial License from Qt Software or from
>> one of its authorized resellers before you start developing
>>
Ben Finney wrote:
>> It is a novel interpretation of the GPL. Qt Software have every
>> right to impose this sort of condition, but it makes me want to
>> avoid them.
>
> No, they have no such right to interpret the GPL this way; it would be
> entirely incompatible with the GPL since it would be a
On 2008-11-09, Stef Mientki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mr.SpOOn wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Stef Mientki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Qt seems to be good, but I don't like their licence.
>>>
>>
>>
>> What's the problem with qt licence?
>
> I can't change a commercial a
On Nov 9, 2:35 am, azrael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> whoever I ask, everyone tells me when it come to python and GUI-s and
> that there is the best way to use WX. I am browsing for the 10th time
> during the last year and I can still not bealive that there is not one
> project to make gui-buildin
* azrael (Sat, 8 Nov 2008 11:35:03 -0800 (PST))
> whoever I ask, everyone tells me when it come to python and GUI-s and
> that there is the best way to use WX.
Don't ask. Think for yourself. wxPython is in my humble opinion the most
popular but only the second best choice.
> I am browsing for th
Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mr.SpOOn wrote:
> > What's the problem with qt licence?
>
> "You must purchase a Qt Commercial License from Qt Software or from
> one of its authorized resellers before you start developing
> commercial software. The Commercial license does not allow the
On 9 Nov 2008 10:46:53 GMT, Duncan Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Mr.SpOOn wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Stef Mientki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> Qt seems to be good, but I don't like their licence.
>>
>>
>> What's the problem with qt licence?
>
> "You must purchase a Qt
Mr.SpOOn wrote:
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Stef Mientki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Qt seems to be good, but I don't like their licence.
What's the problem with qt licence?
I can't change a commercial application into an open application and
vice-versa.
(And therefor I also
Mr.SpOOn wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Stef Mientki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Qt seems to be good, but I don't like their licence.
>
>
> What's the problem with qt licence?
"You must purchase a Qt Commercial License from Qt Software or from one
of its authorized resellers before y
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Stef Mientki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Qt seems to be good, but I don't like their licence.
What's the problem with qt licence?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 1:35 PM, azrael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> whoever I ask, everyone tells me when it come to python and GUI-s and
> that there is the best way to use WX. I am browsing for the 10th time
> during the last year and I can still not bealive that there is not one
> project to mak
On 8 Nov, 20:35, azrael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am freaking out that I need 5 times more time to make a GUI in
> python than in VB.
I find wxFormBuilder nice to work with. wxPython can use XRC-files
from wxFormBuilder.
Note that wx uses sizers (layout managers). While it makes GUIs a bit
On Nov 8, 6:29 pm, Stef Mientki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> azrael wrote:
> > whoever I ask, everyone tells me when it come to python and GUI-s and
> > that there is the best way to use WX. I am browsing for the 10th time
> > during the last year and I can still not bealive that there is not one
>
azrael wrote:
whoever I ask, everyone tells me when it come to python and GUI-s and
that there is the best way to use WX. I am browsing for the 10th time
during the last year and I can still not bealive that there is not one
project to make gui-building easy as maybe in VB for python. Each I
trie
I'ma huge fan of qt and pyqt.
http://trolltech.com/products
-Zac
On Nov 8, 2008 11:35am, azrael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
whoever I ask, everyone tells me when it come to python and GUI-s and
that there is the best way to use WX. I am browsing for the 10th time
during the last year and I ca
26 matches
Mail list logo
