Re: improving python performance by extension module (64bit)

2010-06-26 Thread geremy condra
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Nobody wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:08:27 -0400, geremy condra wrote: > >> I have written Haskell that runs faster than C, and Forth that runs >> faster than C, > > Faster than *what* C, though? Well, than the C it was replacing, which is admittedly not much of

Re: improving python performance by extension module (64bit)

2010-06-26 Thread Nobody
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:08:27 -0400, geremy condra wrote: > I have written Haskell that runs faster than C, and Forth that runs > faster than C, Faster than *what* C, though? With Haskell, there's seldom a significant performance hit for using -fvia-C, so you would probably have been able to get

Re: improving python performance by extension module (64bit)

2010-06-25 Thread geremy condra
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote: > On 25/06/2010 22:25, Stephen Hansen wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Mark >> Lawrencewrote: >> >>> On 25/06/2010 16:34, Stephen Hansen wrote: >>> >>>  Python's slow, sure. But its in practice fast enough for an extremely >>>

Re: improving python performance by extension module (64bit)

2010-06-25 Thread Stephen Hansen
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote: > On 25/06/2010 22:25, Stephen Hansen wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Mark Lawrence> >wrote: >> >> On 25/06/2010 16:34, Stephen Hansen wrote: >>> >>> Python's slow, sure. But its in practice fast enough for an extremely >>>

Re: improving python performance by extension module (64bit)

2010-06-25 Thread Mark Lawrence
On 25/06/2010 22:25, Stephen Hansen wrote: On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Mark Lawrencewrote: On 25/06/2010 16:34, Stephen Hansen wrote: Python's slow, sure. But its in practice fast enough for an extremely broad range of activities. What? What, what? --S Python is *NOT* slow,

Re: improving python performance by extension module (64bit)

2010-06-25 Thread Stephen Hansen
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote: > On 25/06/2010 16:34, Stephen Hansen wrote: > > Python's slow, sure. But its in practice fast enough for an extremely >> broad >> range of activities. >> >> > What? > What, what? --S -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: improving python performance by extension module (64bit)

2010-06-25 Thread Mark Lawrence
On 25/06/2010 16:34, Stephen Hansen wrote: Python's slow, sure. But its in practice fast enough for an extremely broad range of activities. What? Kindest regards. Mark Lawrence. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: improving python performance by extension module (64bit)

2010-06-25 Thread Stephen Hansen
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Peng Yu wrote: > http://psyco.sourceforge.net/ > > The above package can improve python program on 32 bit library. But I > need to run on 64 bit library. Is there any other module that can help > improving the performance of python on 64 bit? > This is a total as

Re: improving python performance by extension module (64bit)

2010-06-25 Thread geremy condra
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Tim Wintle wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 21:52 -0500, Peng Yu wrote: >> http://psyco.sourceforge.net/ >> >> The above package can improve python program on 32 bit library. But I >> need to run on 64 bit library. Is there any other module that can help >> improving

Re: improving python performance by extension module (64bit)

2010-06-25 Thread Tim Wintle
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 21:52 -0500, Peng Yu wrote: > http://psyco.sourceforge.net/ > > The above package can improve python program on 32 bit library. But I > need to run on 64 bit library. Is there any other module that can help > improving the performance of python on 64 bit? As I understand it