Hi,
I'm somewhat late to this discussion, but as the author of PyYAML, I'd
like to put my 2c in.
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:52:56PM -0700, virg wrote:
> Is it possible to deserialize the data by java which serialized by
> Python or is there any compatibility issue. Is there any equivalent
> pic
Paddy wrote:
> hanumizzle wrote:
> > On 5 Oct 2006 22:25:58 -0700, Paddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > You might try picking the data with a different pickle formatter that
> > > your Java can use. Maybe an XML pickler
> > > (http://www.gnosis.cx/download/Gnosis_Utils.More/Gnosis_Utils-1.2.
hanumizzle wrote:
> On 5 Oct 2006 22:25:58 -0700, Paddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You might try picking the data with a different pickle formatter that
> > your Java can use. Maybe an XML pickler
> > (http://www.gnosis.cx/download/Gnosis_Utils.More/Gnosis_Utils-1.2.1.ANNOUNCE
> > untested b
If you must build your web ui in Java, then Jython is probably the best way for you to go. Inside of your java code you need to create a Jython instance. Then you can use the Jython pickle module to deserialize the data you are receiving. Last I remember Jython was equivalent to about CPython
2.2
Hi,
Yes, using python client we are able deserialize data using
r = pickle.loads(result).
where result is a response from the server and r is a dictionary after
deserialization.
For serialisation at the server written in python using
pickle.dumps(result, 2)
Now we are developing web based Clien
On 6 Oct 2006 02:29:59 -0700, virg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes your are right. I will send a dictionary object from the server to
> the client.
> I already have client which is written in python. But we are migrating
> the python client which is a command line tool to Web UI client
> (java).
Yes your are right. I will send a dictionary object from the server to
the client.
I already have client which is written in python. But we are migrating
the python client which is a command line tool to Web UI client
(java). If it is possible to call python function from java, i need to
read mor
On 6 Oct 2006 02:03:07 -0700, virg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the server, based on client request it does some computations , it
> sends the result as dictionary (serialized) to the client.
If I interpret your message correctly, you are receiving a Python
dictionary object from the server. Ye
On 10/6/06, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have to agree that YAML, having started out with simplicity in mind,
> has become a monster that threatens to collapse under its own weight.
> The very existence of JSON is a good indicator that YAML has failed to
> meet its design goals for
At the server, based on client request it does some computations , it
sends the result as dictionary (serialized) to the client.
hanumizzle wrote:
> On 6 Oct 2006 01:41:48 -0700, virg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > The data is simple dictionary with one or more keys. If i use YAML at
> >
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> MonkeeSage wrote:
>
>
>
>>YAML is a little more complex
>
>
> a little? when did you last look at the spec?
>
>
>>and a little more mature.
>
>
> than JavaScript's expression syntax? are you sure you're not confusing
> libraries with standards here? (has anyone e
On 6 Oct 2006 01:41:48 -0700, virg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> The data is simple dictionary with one or more keys. If i use YAML at
> the client (webui) do i have to change serialisation method to YAML at
> server also. Without changing serialisation method at server, can i use
> any of th
Hi,
The data is simple dictionary with one or more keys. If i use YAML at
the client (webui) do i have to change serialisation method to YAML at
server also. Without changing serialisation method at server, can i use
any of the deserialisation methods at the client. We cannot change the
serialisat
On 5 Oct 2006 23:43:50 -0700, MonkeeSage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 6, 1:28 am, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > when did you last look at the spec?
>
> I'm fairly versed in JS objects, having written 10 or so extensions for
> firefox; but I've only used YAML for trivial ta
On Oct 6, 1:28 am, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> when did you last look at the spec?
I'm fairly versed in JS objects, having written 10 or so extensions for
firefox; but I've only used YAML for trivial tasks like config files.
So I can't really say how they stack up in "the big pict
On 10/6/06, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hanumizzle wrote:
>
> > I guess I'll keep an open mind. But I like editing YAML for the same
> > reason that I like editing Python.
>
> JSON is almost identical to Python's expression syntax, of course, while
> YAML isn't even close.
Getting t
hanumizzle wrote:
> I guess I'll keep an open mind. But I like editing YAML for the same
> reason that I like editing Python.
JSON is almost identical to Python's expression syntax, of course, while
YAML isn't even close.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 10/6/06, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MonkeeSage wrote:
>
>
> > YAML is a little more complex
>
> a little? when did you last look at the spec?
>
> > and a little more mature.
>
> than JavaScript's expression syntax? are you sure you're not confusing
> libraries with standards he
MonkeeSage wrote:
> YAML is a little more complex
a little? when did you last look at the spec?
> and a little more mature.
than JavaScript's expression syntax? are you sure you're not confusing
libraries with standards here? (has anyone even managed to write a YAML
library that's small a
On 5 Oct 2006 23:19:18 -0700, MonkeeSage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 6, 1:06 am, hanumizzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm happy with my Pythonesque YAML syntax, thank you. :)
>
> YAML is a little more complex, and a little more mature. But JSON
> should not be ruled out. I actually
On Oct 6, 1:06 am, hanumizzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm happy with my Pythonesque YAML syntax, thank you. :)
YAML is a little more complex, and a little more mature. But JSON
should not be ruled out. I actually like JSON personally.
Regards,
Jordan
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/lis
On 5 Oct 2006 22:54:46 -0700, MonkeeSage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hanumizzle wrote:
> > Why a subset?
>
> I don't think JSON is a subset of YAML.
Apparent slip of the fingers by OP. From JSON website:
JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) is a lightweight data-interchange
format. It is easy for h
hanumizzle wrote:
> Why a subset?
I don't think JSON is a subset of YAML.
Regards,
Jordan
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 5 Oct 2006 22:25:58 -0700, Paddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You might try picking the data with a different pickle formatter that
> your Java can use. Maybe an XML pickler
> (http://www.gnosis.cx/download/Gnosis_Utils.More/Gnosis_Utils-1.2.1.ANNOUNCE
> untested by me).
> You might also use a
virg wrote:
> Hi,
> i have client-server application which is written in python using
> XMLRPC protocol. The existing client is a command line. Now client
> application we are converting it as Web UI using java. I have seen some
> problems in writing a java client. At the server for each reque
On 5 Oct 2006 21:52:56 -0700, virg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> i have client-server application which is written in python using
> XMLRPC protocol. The existing client is a command line. Now client
> application we are converting it as Web UI using java. I have seen some
> problems in w
26 matches
Mail list logo
