Re: grailbrowser now running under python 2.5 (probably above too)

2010-07-14 Thread lkcl
On Jul 11, 10:39 pm, "Martin P. Hellwig" wrote: > On 07/11/10 04:59, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:> source at: > >http://github.com/lkcl/grailbrowser > > > $ python grail.py (note the lack of "python1.5" or "python2.4") > > > conversion of the 80 or so regex's to re has been carried out. > >

Re: grailbrowser now running under python 2.5 (probably above too)

2010-07-14 Thread lkcl
On Jul 11, 5:44 am, rantingrick wrote: > On Jul 10, 10:59 pm, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton > > wrote: > > source at:http://github.com/lkcl/grailbrowser > > > $ python grail.py (note the lack of "python1.5" or "python2.4") > > > conversion of the 80 or so regex's to re has been carried out. > > en

Re: grailbrowser now running under python 2.5 (probably above too)

2010-07-12 Thread Thomas Jollans
On 07/12/2010 01:44 AM, rantingrick wrote: > On Jul 11, 11:31 am, Thomas Jollans wrote: >> On 07/11/2010 07:44 AM, rantingrick wrote: > >>> Congratulations on this effort Luke. However you know what project i >>> would really like to see the community get around? ...dramatic pause >>> here... a c

Re: grailbrowser now running under python 2.5 (probably above too)

2010-07-12 Thread Fuzzyman
On Jul 12, 1:21 am, rantingrick wrote: > On Jul 11, 5:28 pm,Fuzzyman wrote: > > > But why hijack someone else's announcement to do that? Congratulations > > alone would have been great. However good your intentions your message > > came across as "but it would really have been better if you had be

Re: grailbrowser now running under python 2.5 (probably above too)

2010-07-11 Thread Stephen Hansen
On 7/11/10 6:10 PM, rantingrick wrote: > On Jul 11, 7:31 pm, Stephen Hansen wrote: > > You said about macs... >> Copying a file without the resource fork on a mac, *can* result in >> essential data being lost (This is less common then it used to be). As >> simple a task as chown/chmod for posix s

Re: grailbrowser now running under python 2.5 (probably above too)

2010-07-11 Thread rantingrick
On Jul 11, 7:31 pm, Stephen Hansen wrote: You said about macs... > Copying a file without the resource fork on a mac, *can* result in > essential data being lost (This is less common then it used to be). As > simple a task as chown/chmod for posix systems to take ownership of a > file and make it

Re: grailbrowser now running under python 2.5 (probably above too)

2010-07-11 Thread Stephen Hansen
On 7/11/10 5:01 PM, rantingrick wrote: > On Jul 11, 11:57 am, Stephen Hansen wrote: >> On 7/11/10 9:31 AM, Thomas Jollans wrote: >>> trying to >>> support both UNIX and Windows is NOT a good idea. >> >> And you can't lump the Mac in with "UNIX" here, even though it really is >> UNIX at the foundat

Re: grailbrowser now running under python 2.5 (probably above too)

2010-07-11 Thread rantingrick
On Jul 11, 5:28 pm, Fuzzyman wrote: > But why hijack someone else's announcement to do that? Congratulations > alone would have been great. However good your intentions your message > came across as "but it would really have been better if you had been > doing something else instead...". Micheal

Re: grailbrowser now running under python 2.5 (probably above too)

2010-07-11 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 18:31:39 +0200, Thomas Jollans wrote: > Cross platform file manager. Hmm. Does "cross platform" involve UNIX and > something that isn't UNIX, say, Windows? Erm, no. No, no, no. It won't > work. Well, it would work, but it wouldn't be any good. The UNIX and > Windows concepts of

Re: grailbrowser now running under python 2.5 (probably above too)

2010-07-11 Thread rantingrick
On Jul 11, 11:57 am, Stephen Hansen wrote: > On 7/11/10 9:31 AM, Thomas Jollans wrote: > > trying to > > support both UNIX and Windows is NOT a good idea. > > And you can't lump the Mac in with "UNIX" here, even though it really is > UNIX at the foundation, because there's some very fundamental >

Re: grailbrowser now running under python 2.5 (probably above too)

2010-07-11 Thread rantingrick
On Jul 11, 11:31 am, Thomas Jollans wrote: > On 07/11/2010 07:44 AM, rantingrick wrote: > > Congratulations on this effort Luke. However you know what project i > > would really like to see the community get around? ...dramatic pause > > here... a cross platform Python file browser! > > Cross pla

Re: grailbrowser now running under python 2.5 (probably above too)

2010-07-11 Thread MRAB
John Bokma wrote: Thomas Jollans writes: On 07/11/2010 07:44 AM, rantingrick wrote: On Jul 10, 10:59 pm, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: source at:http://github.com/lkcl/grailbrowser $ python grail.py (note the lack of "python1.5" or "python2.4") conversion of the 80 or so regex's to

Re: grailbrowser now running under python 2.5 (probably above too)

2010-07-11 Thread Martin P. Hellwig
On 07/11/10 04:59, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: source at: http://github.com/lkcl/grailbrowser $ python grail.py (note the lack of "python1.5" or "python2.4") conversion of the 80 or so regex's to re has been carried out. entirely successfully or not is a matter yet to be determined. al

Re: grailbrowser now running under python 2.5 (probably above too)

2010-07-11 Thread Fuzzyman
On Jul 11, 5:16 pm, rantingrick wrote: > On Jul 11, 9:01 am, a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote: > > > As usual, you would rather tell other people what to do instead of doing > > any work yourself. > > Dear God! My statement was intended to fetch responses like... > >   "Hey, that sounds like a gr

Re: grailbrowser now running under python 2.5 (probably above too)

2010-07-11 Thread John Bokma
Thomas Jollans writes: > On 07/11/2010 07:44 AM, rantingrick wrote: >> On Jul 10, 10:59 pm, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton >> wrote: >>> source at:http://github.com/lkcl/grailbrowser >>> >>> $ python grail.py (note the lack of "python1.5" or "python2.4") >>> >>> conversion of the 80 or so regex's

Re: grailbrowser now running under python 2.5 (probably above too)

2010-07-11 Thread Stephen Hansen
On 7/11/10 9:31 AM, Thomas Jollans wrote: > Cross platform file manager. Hmm. Does "cross platform" involve UNIX and > something that isn't UNIX, say, Windows? > Erm, no. No, no, no. It won't work. Well, it would work, but it wouldn't > be any good. The UNIX and Windows concepts of "file system" ar

Re: grailbrowser now running under python 2.5 (probably above too)

2010-07-11 Thread Thomas Jollans
On 07/11/2010 07:44 AM, rantingrick wrote: > On Jul 10, 10:59 pm, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton > wrote: >> source at:http://github.com/lkcl/grailbrowser >> >> $ python grail.py (note the lack of "python1.5" or "python2.4") >> >> conversion of the 80 or so regex's to re has been carried out. >> ent

Re: grailbrowser now running under python 2.5 (probably above too)

2010-07-11 Thread rantingrick
On Jul 11, 9:01 am, a...@pythoncraft.com (Aahz) wrote: > As usual, you would rather tell other people what to do instead of doing > any work yourself. Dear God! My statement was intended to fetch responses like... "Hey, that sounds like a great idea" or \ "Hey, lets get hacking on this". I

Re: grailbrowser now running under python 2.5 (probably above too)

2010-07-11 Thread Aahz
In article , rantingrick wrote: > >Congratulations on this effort Luke. However you know what project i >would really like to see the community get around? ...dramatic pause >here... a cross platform Python file browser! Yes i know there are >tons of them out there already and Python is a bit slo

Re: grailbrowser now running under python 2.5 (probably above too)

2010-07-11 Thread Aahz
In article , Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > >$ python grail.py (note the lack of "python1.5" or "python2.4") Congrats! -- Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "Normal is what cuts off your sixth finger and your tail..." --Siobhan -- http://

Re: grailbrowser now running under python 2.5 (probably above too)

2010-07-10 Thread rantingrick
On Jul 10, 10:59 pm, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > source at:http://github.com/lkcl/grailbrowser > > $ python grail.py (note the lack of "python1.5" or "python2.4") > > conversion of the 80 or so regex's to re has been carried out. > entirely successfully or not is a matter yet to be deter