Re: generic equivalence partition

2005-02-26 Thread Erik Max Francis
Xah Lee wrote: ... sorry for the latching on on this broadside issue, but it is impotant ... You made a typo in that last word there. Obviously you meant to write an _e_ instead of an _a_. -- Erik Max Francis && [EMAIL PROTECTED] && http://www.alcyone.com/max/ San Jose, CA, USA && 37 20 N 121 53

Re: generic equivalence partition

2005-02-26 Thread Xah Lee
People, ... sorry for the latching on on this broadside issue, but it is impotant ... here's are some germane points from another online discussion: the bug-reporting issue has came up so many times by so many people i thought i'd make a comment of my view. when a software is ostensibly incorre

Re: generic equivalence partition

2005-02-26 Thread Xah Lee
folks: when using google to post a reply, it sometimes truncates the subject line. i.e. [perl-python] is lost. This software error is obvious, they could not have not noticed it. another thing more egregious is that google _intentionally_ edit with people's posts. (e.g. they change email address

Re: generic equivalence partition

2005-02-26 Thread Xah Lee
# the following solution is submitted by # Sean Gugler and David Eppstein independently # 20050224. @def parti(aList, equalFunc): @result = [] @for i in range(len(aList)): @for s in result: @if equalFunc( aList[i], aList[s[0]] ): @s.append(i) @