On Jan 20, 2:59 pm, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> rupert.thurner wrote:
> > i forgot to mention that i cannot see any explicit sys._getframe(), or
> > __del__ in the genshi code, while the ones intrac-core seemed to be
> > there in 0.10.4.
>
> Does the code keep a reference to a tra
On Jan 20, 2:59 pm, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> rupert.thurner wrote:
> > i forgot to mention that i cannot see any explicit sys._getframe(), or
> > __del__ in the genshi code, while the ones intrac-core seemed to be
> > there in 0.10.4.
>
> Does the code keep a reference to a tra
rupert.thurner wrote:
> i forgot to mention that i cannot see any explicit sys._getframe(), or
> __del__ in the genshi code, while the ones in trac-core seemed to be
> there in 0.10.4.
Does the code keep a reference to a traceback object or an attribute of
a traceback object?
Christian
--
http:
On Jan 20, 12:40 pm, "rupert.thurner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Jan 19, 10:31 pm, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
>
> > > Hi Christian,
>
> > > -On [20080119 16:16], Christian Heimes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > >> I forgot one
On Jan 19, 10:31 pm, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
>
> > Hi Christian,
>
> > -On [20080119 16:16], Christian Heimes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> I forgot one important point in my reply. The GC module contains some
> >> useful methods for debu
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> -On [20080119 16:16], Christian Heimes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> I forgot one important point in my reply. The GC module contains some
>> useful methods for debugging. Check gc.garbage. It should be empty.
>
> Yeah, we're messing around
Hi Christian,
-On [20080119 16:16], Christian Heimes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>I forgot one important point in my reply. The GC module contains some
>useful methods for debugging. Check gc.garbage. It should be empty.
Yeah, we're messing around with that stuff as well as many other ways of
tryi
rupert.thurner wrote:
> what would be a good means of finding where the 0.11 version of
> edgewall trac uses excessive memory. see
> http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev/browse_thread/thread/116e519da54f16b
> for some details, where jonas suggested
> http://wingolog.org/archives/2007/11/27/reduc