Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:11:44 -0800, Catherine Moroney
> wrote:
>> [snip]
>>>
>>> The easy thing is to use a Queue object. The background thread uses
>>> .put() to place a computed result on the QUeue and the caller uses
>>> .get() to read from the queue. There's an ass
On 14Jan2009 17:11, Catherine Moroney wrote:
> Cameron Simpson wrote:
>> On 14Jan2009 15:50, Catherine Moroney
>> wrote:
>>> James Mills wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Catherine Moroney
wrote:
> I would like to spawn off multiple instances of a function
> and run the
Speaking of Threading ..
http://codepad.org/dvxwAphE
Just a really interesting way of doing this :)
cheers
James
--
-- "Problems are solved by method"
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Jan 14, 2009, at 5:20 PM, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:11:44 -0800, Catherine Moroney
wrote:
[snip]
The easy thing is to use a Queue object. The background thread uses
.put() to place a computed result on the QUeue and the caller uses
.get() to read from the queue. T
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:11:44 -0800, Catherine Moroney
wrote:
[snip]
The easy thing is to use a Queue object. The background thread uses
.put() to place a computed result on the QUeue and the caller uses
.get() to read from the queue. There's an assortment of other ways too.
Cheers,
Thank y
Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 14Jan2009 15:50, Catherine Moroney wrote:
James Mills wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Catherine Moroney
wrote:
I would like to spawn off multiple instances of a function
and run them simultaneously and then wait until they all complete.
[...]
Try using th
On Jan 14, 6:00 pm, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 14Jan2009 15:50, Catherine Moroney
> wrote:
>
> > James Mills wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Catherine Moroney
> >> wrote:
> >>> I would like to spawn off multiple instances of a function
> >>> and run them simultaneously and then w
On 14Jan2009 15:50, Catherine Moroney wrote:
> James Mills wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Catherine Moroney
>> wrote:
>>> I would like to spawn off multiple instances of a function
>>> and run them simultaneously and then wait until they all complete.
[...]
>> Try using the python st
James Mills wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Catherine Moroney
wrote:
I would like to spawn off multiple instances of a function
and run them simultaneously and then wait until they all complete.
Currently I'm doing this by calling them as sub-processes
executable from the command-line.
> The disadvantage of threads in Python (CPython, actually) is that
> there's the GIL (Global Interpreter Lock), so you won't get any speed
> advantage if the threads are mostly processor-bound.
On a single processor machine with compute-bound threads, I don't the
GIL is the bottleneck. No matter
On Jan 13, 7:02 pm, Catherine Moroney
wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I know how to spawn a sub-process and then wait until it
> completes. I'm wondering if I can do the same thing with
> a Python function.
>
> I would like to spawn off multiple instances of a function
> and run them simultaneously
On Jan 14, 2:02 am, Catherine Moroney
wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I know how to spawn a sub-process and then wait until it
> completes. I'm wondering if I can do the same thing with
> a Python function.
>
> I would like to spawn off multiple instances of a function
> and run them simultaneously
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:35 AM, MRAB wrote:
> The disadvantage of threads in Python (CPython, actually) is that
> there's the GIL (Global Interpreter Lock), so you won't get any speed
> advantage if the threads are mostly processor-bound.
The OP didn't really say what this function
does :) *sig
James Mills wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Catherine Moroney
wrote:
I would like to spawn off multiple instances of a function and run
them simultaneously and then wait until they all complete.
Currently I'm doing this by calling them as sub-processes
executable from the command-lin
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Catherine Moroney
wrote:
> I would like to spawn off multiple instances of a function
> and run them simultaneously and then wait until they all complete.
> Currently I'm doing this by calling them as sub-processes
> executable from the command-line. Is there a w
15 matches
Mail list logo
