On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 12:13 pm, Rustom Mody wrote:
> On Sunday, August 13, 2017 at 6:04:42 AM UTC+5:30, Man with No Name wrote:
[...]
>> The namespace could be a global, synchronized object repository as well as
>> holding local copies.
>
> I ‘Mark’ the piquant point that the ‘Man with No Name’ wis
On Sunday, August 13, 2017 at 6:04:42 AM UTC+5:30, Man with No Name wrote:
> So
>
> I've an idea to make use of python's unique environment (>>>) to form a
> peer-to-peer object-sharing ecosystem.
>
> Just pie-in-the-sky brainstorming...
>
> When a programmer (or object-user) starts up the
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Steve D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 07:39 am, Man with No Name wrote:
I've no idea who you're responding to. Those posts aren't coming
through at my end.
ChrisA
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 07:39 am, Man with No Name wrote:
>> Pretty much any programming language *could* have an interactive interpreter,
>> if somebody spent the effort to build one.
>
> Are you sure?
Yes.
>> The thing about re-useable software components is that it turns out that most
>> of the
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 10:34 am, Man with No Name wrote:
> So
>
> I've an idea to make use of python's unique environment (>>>) to form a
> peer-to-peer object-sharing ecosystem.
Sounds perfectly awful.
By the way, Python's interactive interpreter (>>>) is hardly unique. Just off
the top of my
