On 03/04/2016 05:18 AM, Larry Martell wrote:
> Unfortunately very slow - around 8 minutes to zip a 7GB dir using the
> command line zip vs. 13 seconds with the python zipfile module.
And likely Python's zipfile is just giving up and storing the file
without compression. What does unzip -v say abo
On Fri, 04 Mar 2016 13:31:52 -0700, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:50 AM, crankypuss wrote:
>> I don't know about that, but you've certainly shown that what I was told
>> about this group being helpful and non-combative is bullshit.
>
> Look in a mirror much?
You/We should thank $
Larry Martell wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Friday 04 March 2016 07:18:57 Larry Martell wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Larry Martell
>> wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Chris Angelico
>> wrote:
>>> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:38 A
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 04 March 2016 07:18:57 Larry Martell wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Larry Martell
> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Chris Angelico
> wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:38 AM, MRAB
> wrote:
>> >>> Is it
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:50 AM, crankypuss wrote:
> I don't know about that, but you've certainly shown that what I was told
> about this group being helpful and non-combative is bullshit.
Look in a mirror much?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2016-03-04, crankypuss wrote:
>> Larry Martell wrote:
> [...]
>>> Which I don't love as a solution. Anyone know a cleaner way to get
>>> zipfile to zip the links?
>>
>> I don't even know what "zipfile" is, is that a Windows command?
>
> It's a module in the Python stand
On 2016-03-04, crankypuss wrote:
> Larry Martell wrote:
[...]
>> Which I don't love as a solution. Anyone know a cleaner way to get
>> zipfile to zip the links?
>
> I don't even know what "zipfile" is, is that a Windows command?
It's a module in the Python standard library. You see, this is a
P
On Friday 04 March 2016 07:18:57 Larry Martell wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Larry Martell
wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Chris Angelico
wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:38 AM, MRAB
wrote:
> >>> Is it even possible to zip a link?
> >>>
> >>> A quick search came up
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Larry Martell wrote:
> Unfortunately very slow - around 8 minutes to zip a 7GB dir using the
> command line zip vs. 13 seconds with the python zipfile module.
13 seconds? That sounds wrong for 7GB. I doubt you can deflate that
much data that quickly on any modern
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Larry Martell wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:38 AM, MRAB wrote:
>>> Is it even possible to zip a link?
>>>
>>> A quick search came up with this:
>>>
>>> Are hard links possible within a zip archive?
>>>
On 04/03/2016 11:03, crankypuss wrote:
> Larry Martell wrote:
>
>> I have a script that creates zip files of dirs containing symlinks. I
>> was surprised to find that the zipfiles have zipped the targets of the
>> links as opposed to the links themselves, which is what I wanted and
>> expected. Go
Larry Martell wrote:
> I have a script that creates zip files of dirs containing symlinks. I
> was surprised to find that the zipfiles have zipped the targets of the
> links as opposed to the links themselves, which is what I wanted and
> expected. Googling I found this:
>
> https://doeidoei.word
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:38 AM, MRAB wrote:
>> Is it even possible to zip a link?
>>
>> A quick search came up with this:
>>
>> Are hard links possible within a zip archive?
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8859616/are-hard-links-possib
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:38 AM, MRAB wrote:
> Is it even possible to zip a link?
>
> A quick search came up with this:
>
> Are hard links possible within a zip archive?
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8859616/are-hard-links-possible-within-a-zip-archive
Hard links are different. Symlinks are
On 2016-03-03 20:58, Larry Martell wrote:
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Larry Martell wrote:
I have a script that creates zip files of dirs containing symlinks. I
was surprised to find that the zipfiles have zipped the targets of the
links as opposed to the links themselves, which is what I w
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Larry Martell wrote:
> I have a script that creates zip files of dirs containing symlinks. I
> was surprised to find that the zipfiles have zipped the targets of the
> links as opposed to the links themselves, which is what I wanted and
> expected. Googling I found
16 matches
Mail list logo
