On Jan 22, 10:30 pm, Steve Holden wrote:
> >> Oh, sorry, did I have the wrong opinion?
>
> > You had a condescending attitude.
>
> Towards someone who is fairly obviously not a Python neophyte.
>
> Please don't think we are telling you you can't have any opinion you
> like. Just don't expect to ge
On Jan 22, 7:51 pm, Phlip wrote:
> On Jan 21, 9:00 pm, Michele Simionato
> wrote:
>
> > Just for fun I have run cloc on our trunk:
>
> > SUM: 8743 272238 215871 1470139 x 1.84 =
> > 2708354.95
>
> Nice!
>
> My favorite version of a cloc system can distinguish test from
>
Op donderdag 21 januari 2010 schreef Michele:
> I need a small utility to count the lines of Python code in a
> directory, traversing subdirectories and ignoring comments and
> docstrings.
sloccount can do this.
http://www.dwheeler.com/sloccount/
Met vriendelijke groet,
Wilbert Berendsen
--
h
Robert Kern wrote:
> On 2010-01-21 15:31 , Phlip wrote:
>> Aahz wrote:
>>> In article
>>> <7e09df6a-cda1-480e-a971-8f8a70ac4...@b9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
>>> Phlip wrote:
On Jan 20, 11:20=A0pm, Michele Simionato
wrote:
> pylint does too many things, I want something fast that ju
On Jan 21, 9:00 pm, Michele Simionato
wrote:
> Just for fun I have run cloc on our trunk:
>
> SUM: 8743 272238 215871 1470139 x 1.84 =
> 2708354.95
Nice!
My favorite version of a cloc system can distinguish test from
production code. That's why I always use executable c
On Jan 21, 9:24 pm, Phlip wrote:
> On Jan 20, 11:20 pm, Michele Simionato
> wrote:
>
> > pylint does too many things, I want something fast that just counts
> > the lines and can be run on thousands of files at once.
> > cloc seems fine, I have just tried on 2,000 files and it gives me a
> > repo
On 2010-01-21 15:31 , Phlip wrote:
Aahz wrote:
In article
<7e09df6a-cda1-480e-a971-8f8a70ac4...@b9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
Phlip wrote:
On Jan 20, 11:20=A0pm, Michele Simionato
wrote:
pylint does too many things, I want something fast that just counts
the lines and can be run on thousands
Aahz wrote:
In article <7e09df6a-cda1-480e-a971-8f8a70ac4...@b9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
Phlip wrote:
On Jan 20, 11:20=A0pm, Michele Simionato
wrote:
pylint does too many things, I want something fast that just counts
the lines and can be run on thousands of files at once.
cloc seems fine,
In article <7e09df6a-cda1-480e-a971-8f8a70ac4...@b9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
Phlip wrote:
>On Jan 20, 11:20=A0pm, Michele Simionato
>wrote:
>>
>> pylint does too many things, I want something fast that just counts
>> the lines and can be run on thousands of files at once.
>> cloc seems fine, I
On Jan 20, 11:20 pm, Michele Simionato
wrote:
> pylint does too many things, I want something fast that just counts
> the lines and can be run on thousands of files at once.
> cloc seems fine, I have just tried on 2,000 files and it gives me a
> report in just a few seconds.
In my experience wit
On Jan 21, 8:12 am, Ben Finney wrote:
> Michele Simionato writes:
> > I need a small utility to count the lines of Python code in a
> > directory, traversing subdirectories and ignoring comments and
> > docstrings. I am sure there is already something doing that, what do
> > you suggest?
>
> Any
I did not known about cloc, it does more that I need, but it looks
cool (it is perl and not Python, by who cares? ;)
Thanks,
Michele
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Michele Simionato writes:
> I need a small utility to count the lines of Python code in a
> directory, traversing subdirectories and ignoring comments and
> docstrings. I am sure there is already something doing that, what do
> you suggest?
Any of the static code checkers (‘pylint’, ‘pyflakes’,
On 21/01/2010 5:51 PM, Michele Simionato wrote:
I need a small utility to count the lines of Python code in a
directory, traversing subdirectories and ignoring comments and
docstrings. I am sure there is already something doing that, what do
you suggest?
I suggest typing your subject line into
14 matches
Mail list logo
