On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:35:51 +, Tom Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:57:05 +0100, Gabriel Zachmann wrote:
>>
>>> I was wondering why python doesn't contain a way to make things "const"?
>>>
>>> If it were possible to "declare" variables
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:57:05 +0100, Gabriel Zachmann wrote:
>
>> I was wondering why python doesn't contain a way to make things "const"?
>>
>> If it were possible to "declare" variables at the time they are bound
>> to objects that they should not al
Gabriel Zachmann wrote:
>
> I was wondering why python doesn't contain a way to make things "const"?
>
> If it were possible to "declare" variables at the time they are bound to
> objects that they should not allow modification of the object, then we
> would have a concept _orthogonal_ to data
Gabriel Zachmann wrote:
>
> I was wondering why python doesn't contain a way to make things "const"?
>
> If it were possible to "declare" variables at the time they are bound to
> objects that they should not allow modification of the object, then we
> would have a concept _orthogonal_ to data
Gabriel Zachmann wrote:
[...]
>
> It seems to me that implementing that feature would be fairly easy.
> All that would be needed is a flag with each variable.
>
It seems to me like it should be quite easy to add a sixth forward gear
to my car, but I'm quite sure an auto engineer would quickly be
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:57:05 +0100, Gabriel Zachmann wrote:
> I was wondering why python doesn't contain a way to make things "const"?
>
> If it were possible to "declare" variables at the time they are bound to
> objects that they should not allow modification of the object, then we would
> ha
