> I have two versions of bsddb3 installed (only one is active) this is
> from /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages:
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2007-11-03 15:01 bsddb3
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root905 2007-11-03 15:39 bsddb3-4.4.2.egg-info
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root905 2007-11-03 15:49 bsddb3-4
On Nov 4, 1:04 am, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I know that when you upgrade Berkeley DB you're supposed to go through
> > steps solving this problem,but I wasn't expecting an upgrade. I've
> > tried to use different versions bsddb3, 4.4 and 4.5, (instead of bsddb
> > that comes
> I know that when you upgrade Berkeley DB you're supposed to go through
> steps solving this problem,but I wasn't expecting an upgrade. I've
> tried to use different versions bsddb3, 4.4 and 4.5, (instead of bsddb
> that comes with python 2.5.1) with different versions of Berkeley DB
> installs (4
Marc> "DB_VERSION_MISMATCH: Database environment version mismatch --
Marc> Program version 4.4 doesn't match environment version 186187776.0"
Marc> DBError: -30971
I haven't used bsddb much recently, but in the past I think this usually
meant that the Sleepycat folks released a new ve
leasun wrote:
> Anybody knows which version bsddb is released with py2.3 and py2.4?
Is this what you wanted?
Python 2.4.1 (#65, Mar 30 2005, 09:13:57) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on
win32
>>> import bsddb
>>> bsddb.__version__
'4.3.0'
I'll leave it up to you to do the work to find out what it is
Upgrading db4 to db4-4.1.25-14.rpm seems to have take care of this.
On 7/10/05, Barry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have python2.4.1 installed on two machines:
> -- one is Fedora core 1, where the bsddb module works fine
> -- one is Redhat ES 3.0, and I installed mysql 4.1 (and
> mysql-python2
Andrew MacIntyre wrote:
If you can, I'd suggest posting a bug report on SF against 2.4 to see
whether you can encourage the installer builder to upgrade BSD DB -
though do be certain to check what's in 2.4.1c1 first.
It's 4.2.52, and I don't think I'm going to use anything else for 2.4.1.
In fact
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > It doesn't seem like the python 2.4(and the recent 2.4.1) support
> > berkeley db 4.3.
>
> What makes you say that? It builds fine for me.
Oh, it doesn't work with 2.4(I tried this one) but with 2.4.1
seemingly.
In the setup.py from 2.4 there
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't seem like the python 2.4(and the recent 2.4.1) support
berkeley db 4.3. (4.3 fixes some deadlock bugs I occasionally encounter
using 4.2.)
bsddb3(at pybsddb.sf.net) already supports 4.3 since last December(but
doesn't explicitly support win32 -- see the assert st
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It doesn't seem like the python 2.4(and the recent 2.4.1) support
berkeley db 4.3.
What makes you say that? It builds fine for me.
bsddb3(at pybsddb.sf.net) already supports 4.3 since last December(but
doesn't explicitly support win32 -- see the assert statement in
setup.p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
uhm i'm trying to make a very simple but large database:
Let's say I want these fields : |name|age|country|
Then I can't do this because I use the same key
db["name"] = 'piet'
db["age"] = '20'
db["country"] = 'nl'
#same keys so it wil overwrite
db["name"] = 'jan'
db["ag
uhm i'm trying to make a very simple but large database:
Let's say I want these fields : |name|age|country|
Then I can't do this because I use the same key
db["name"] = 'piet'
db["age"] = '20'
db["country"] = 'nl'
#same keys so it wil overwrite
db["name"] = 'jan'
db["age"] = '40'
db["country
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 01:31:04PM +0300, Denis S. Otkidach wrote:
> You are not right, records in BTree (btopen) are certainly sorted. For
> positive integers you can pack keys with struct.pack('>I', value).
You're right... I missed the btopen (rather a key thing to miss I know, but
when you hav
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:48:44 -0500
Christopher De Vries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you want your key, value pairs in a certain order you have to sort
> them yourself. Dictionaries and bsddb keys are unsorted.
You are not right, records in BTree (btopen) are certainly sorted. For
positive in
oyea, I must convert it to numbers ;)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Christopher De Vries wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 08:30:59AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WHen I use the code below and printing all the results i get this:
--
0 1 10
11 2 3
4 5 6
7 8 9
--
But I want
--
0 1 2
3 4 5
6 7 8
9 10 11
--
If you want your key, value pairs in a certai
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 08:30:59AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> WHen I use the code below and printing all the results i get this:
> --
> 0 1 10
> 11 2 3
> 4 5 6
> 7 8 9
> --
> But I want
> --
> 0 1 2
> 3 4 5
> 6 7 8
> 9 10 11
> --
If you want your key, value pairs in a certai
17 matches
Mail list logo
