On 2007-12-12, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 12, 7:22 am, Neil Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> List and deque disagree on what __init__ does. Which one is
>> right?
>
> File a bug report and assign to me.
Will do. Registration in progress.
--
Neil Cerutti
--
http:/
On Dec 12, 8:41 am, Calvin Spealman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It documents that deque.__init__ initializes it, as all __init__
> methods do. All init methods are also assumed to _only_ be called at
> the start of the life of the object and never more than once, so
> breaking that breaks assumpti
On Dec 12, 2007, at 4:05 PM, Neil Cerutti wrote:
> On 2007-12-12, Calvin Spealman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I agree that the behavior should be more consistant, but you
>> also should not be calling __init__ more than once on any
>> given instance and that in and of itself should probably
>>
On Dec 12, 7:22 am, Neil Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> List and deque disagree on what __init__ does. Which one is
> right?
File a bug report and assign to me.
Raymond
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2007-12-12, Calvin Spealman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree that the behavior should be more consistant, but you
> also should not be calling __init__ more than once on any
> given instance and that in and of itself should probably
> constitute undefined behavior.
That seems wise to me,
I agree that the behavior should be more consistant, but you also
should not be calling __init__ more than once on any given instance
and that in and of itself should probably constitute undefined behavior.
On Dec 12, 2007, at 3:22 PM, Neil Cerutti wrote:
> List and deque disagree on what __i
