Re: XML vs. cPickle

2006-01-13 Thread Mike
> I'd guess that XML serialisation with cElementTree is both cpu and > memory competitive with cpickle, if not superior. Although I'm too lazy > to fire up the timeit module right now :-) That maybe true, but I bet Marshal is the fastest. ...right? > Also, how quickly the relevant parsers work de

Re: XML vs. cPickle

2006-01-13 Thread Alan Kennedy
[Mike] > I know XML is more (processor) costly than cPickle, but how bad is it? Are you sure you know that? I'd guess that XML serialisation with cElementTree is both cpu and memory competitive with cpickle, if not superior. Although I'm too lazy to fire up the timeit module right now :-) Also