Steve Juranich wrote:
>> I've found the tp_base and tp_bases elements and I've set them to the
>> base type object (and a tuple containing the base type object) before I
>> call PyType_Ready but in Python the base class isn't recognised. Is there
>> anything obvious I'm missing?
>
> Well, I can't
Roy> I've been playing around with ctypes
Roy> (http://starship.python.net/crew/theller/ctypes/) recently. So
Roy> far, it looks pretty cool.
Wrapping C++ libraries?
Skip
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Chris Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Diez B Roggisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> PyType_Ready but in Python the base class isn't recognised. Is
> >> there anything obvious I'm missing?
>
> > Maybe - I'd go for one of the several avail
> Diez B Roggisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> PyType_Ready but in Python the base class isn't recognised. Is
>> there anything obvious I'm missing?
> Maybe - I'd go for one of the several available python wrapper
> generators. I personally had good experiences with SIP. But
On 4/18/05, Andrew Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to wrap a C++ class hierarchy with Python types and I'd like to
> maintain the hierarchy in the types. I'm fairly sure this is possible,
> isn't it?
Yes.
> Are there any documents explaining how to do this, the standard Python
>
> PyType_Ready but in Python the base class isn't recognised. Is there
> anything obvious I'm missing?
Maybe - I'd go for one of the several available python wrapper generators. I
personally had good experiences with SIP. But you might also try boost
python or SWIG.
The python C-API is great - f
