David Hopwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Matthias Blume wrote:
>> I agree with Bob Harper about safety being language-specific and all
>> that. But, with all due respect, I think his characterization of C is
>> not accurate.
> [...]
>> AFAIC, C is C-unsafe by Bob's reasoning.
>
> Agreed.
>
>>
Matthias Blume wrote:
> I agree with Bob Harper about safety being language-specific and all
> that. But, with all due respect, I think his characterization of C is
> not accurate.
[...]
> AFAIC, C is C-unsafe by Bob's reasoning.
Agreed.
> Of course, C can be made safe quite easily:
>
> Define
