On 1/30/2011 8:14 PM, Littlefield, Tyler wrote:
If you are on windows, you can use high-resolution timers. What you are
trying is physically impossible though: lets say you have a processor
that runs at 2.5 GHz. that's 2.5 billion cycles per second, give or take
a few. So, the lowest you can go i
If you are on windows, you can use high-resolution timers. What you are
trying is physically impossible though: lets say you have a processor
that runs at 2.5 GHz. that's 2.5 billion cycles per second, give or take
a few. So, the lowest you can go is nanoseconds. You're trying to time
like 10x
