DurumDara wrote:
> 10 May 2006 04:57:17 -0700, Serge Orlov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I thought md5 algorithm is pretty light, so you'll be I/O-bound, then
> > why bother with multi-processor algorithm?
>
> This is an assessor utility.
> The program's architecture must be flexible, because I don't kn
10 May 2006 04:57:17 -0700, Serge Orlov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I thought md5 algorithm is pretty light, so you'll be I/O-bound, then
> why bother with multi-processor algorithm?
This is an assessor utility.
The program's architecture must be flexible, because I don't know,
where it need to run (on
Dara Durum wrote:
[snip design of a multi-processor algorithm]
I thought md5 algorithm is pretty light, so you'll be I/O-bound, then
why bother with multi-processor algorithm?
> 2.)
> Do you know command line to just like FSUM that can compute file
> hashes (MD5/SHA1), and don't have any proble
