Hi!
If you are under Vista, or Windows 7, have you unactivate UAC, before
the update?
@+
MCI
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 11/05/2010 23:13, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
When will it install into system32?
When you install "for all users".
Did the upgrade inform you that it was an upgrade, or did it warn you
that you would overwrite the previous installation?
It warned me that there is a previous
> If we install over an existing version of Python 2.6.5, will our PTH
> files and site-packages be preserved?
>
> Or do we need to back out our 3rd party packages, install Python 2.6.5
> and then manually restore our 3rd party packages?
An upgrade installation will only replace the Python files,
On 5/11/2010 5:27 PM, pyt...@bdurham.com wrote:
Martin,
If we install over an existing version of Python 2.6.5, will our PTH
files and site-packages be preserved?
Or do we need to back out our 3rd party packages, install Python 2.6.5
and then manually restore our 3rd party packages?
In my exp
Martin,
If we install over an existing version of Python 2.6.5, will our PTH
files and site-packages be preserved?
Or do we need to back out our 3rd party packages, install Python 2.6.5
and then manually restore our 3rd party packages?
Thank you,
Malcolm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listin
> When will it install into system32?
When you install "for all users".
>> Did the upgrade inform you that it was an upgrade, or did it warn you
>> that you would overwrite the previous installation?
>>
> It warned me that there is a previous installation.
Hmm. You don't remember the exact m
Martin,
Thanks for the quick reply.
On 10/05/2010 22:25, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
Werner F. Bruhin wrote:
Just upgraded on my Windows 7 machine my copy of 2.6.4 to 2.6.5.
However doing sys.version still shows 2.6.4 even so python.exe is dated
19. March 2010 with a size of 26.624 bytes.
Is
Werner F. Bruhin wrote:
> Just upgraded on my Windows 7 machine my copy of 2.6.4 to 2.6.5.
>
> However doing sys.version still shows 2.6.4 even so python.exe is dated
> 19. March 2010 with a size of 26.624 bytes.
>
> Is this a known issue? Or did I do something wrong?
Look at the copy of python
