On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 05:03:13 -, W. eWatson
wrote:
See my response to Scott. Thanks for your reply.
I did. It was fundamentally mistaken in so many respects that
I formally give up on you.
--
Rhodri James *-* Wildebeeste Herder to the Masses
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/p
* W. eWatson (Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:58:33 -0800)
> Scott David Daniels wrote:
> > OK, you are using the oldest and least useful revision control
> > system, "rename and remember." I'd suggest you get and use bazaar,
> > but you'll just ask for shortcuts on how to use it without
> > understanding what
* Rhodri James (Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:57:42 -)
>
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:13:38 -, W. eWatson
> wrote:
>
> > OK, enough tinkering with the code and others matters on my end trying
> > to find a work around. Somehow after much successful use of IDLE's
> > execution facility, I've step
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:58:33 -0800, W. eWatson wrote:
> Scott David Daniels wrote:
>> OK, you are using the oldest and least useful revision control system,
>> "rename and remember." I'd suggest you get and use bazaar, but you'll
>> just ask for shortcuts on how to use it without understanding wh
...
How can it? It's not IDLE's problem, it's yours.
Finally, we can probably agree that I can continue to use IDLE for
editing and syntax checking, but to "guarantee" successful execution
of the program, I can just double-click on the py file in my folder.
Perhaps there is a better way than
Scott David Daniels wrote:
W. eWatson wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
W. eWatson wrote:
From Diez above.
What does *NOT* work is writing a Tkinter-based app in idle, and to
run it
*FROM INSIDE* idle. Instead, open your explorer and double-click on the
pyhton-file your app is in. That's all that t
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:13:38 -, W. eWatson
wrote:
OK, enough tinkering with the code and others matters on my end trying
to find a work around. Somehow after much successful use of IDLE's
execution facility, I've stepped on an invisible banana peel. I think
it's evident that I'm not
W. eWatson wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
W. eWatson wrote:
From Diez above.
What does *NOT* work is writing a Tkinter-based app in idle, and to
run it
*FROM INSIDE* idle. Instead, open your explorer and double-click on the
pyhton-file your app is in. That's all that there is to it.
So this is t
Terry Reedy wrote:
W. eWatson wrote:
From Diez above.
What does *NOT* work is writing a Tkinter-based app in idle, and to
run it
*FROM INSIDE* idle. Instead, open your explorer and double-click on the
pyhton-file your app is in. That's all that there is to it.
So this is the absolute truth?
W. eWatson wrote:
From Diez above.
What does *NOT* work is writing a Tkinter-based app in idle, and to run it
*FROM INSIDE* idle. Instead, open your explorer and double-click on the
pyhton-file your app is in. That's all that there is to it.
So this is the absolute truth? No wiggle room? One ca
From Diez above.
What does *NOT* work is writing a Tkinter-based app in idle, and to run it
*FROM INSIDE* idle. Instead, open your explorer and double-click on the
pyhton-file your app is in. That's all that there is to it.
So this is the absolute truth? No wiggle room? One can never use a Tkinte
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:16:38 -, W. eWatson
wrote:
Greetings and salutations.
I just uninstalled all traces of (Active) pythonWin 2.5.2 from this
machine, In fact, I uninstalled python 2.5.2 with IDLE from this
machine. I then reinstalled the latter. Then I ran the program. XP Pro.
Greetings and salutations.
I just uninstalled all traces of (Active) pythonWin 2.5.2 from this machine,
In fact, I uninstalled python 2.5.2 with IDLE from this machine. I then
reinstalled the latter. Then I ran the program. XP Pro.
I then went to another machine that has never had pythonWin o
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:44:56 -, W. eWatson
wrote:
I simply ask, "How do I get around the problem?"
Run your program from the command line, or by double-clicking.
You've been told this several times now.
--
Rhodri James *-* Wildebeeste Herder to the Masses
--
http://mail.python.org/mail
W. eWatson wrote:
As with Diez, I simply ask, "How do I get around the problem?" Are you
two telling me that it is impossible?
Try this analogy. One television, two stubborn kids that want to watch
different programs. One has the remote, the other the buttons on the
TV. What happens? How
W. eWatson wrote:
As with Diez, I simply ask, "How do I get around the problem?" Are you
two telling me that it is impossible?
OK, here's my offer to both of you. Do you have IDLE for Python 2.5 and
have good familiarity with Tkinter? If so, I'll send you the code and
you can try it yourself
W. eWatson wrote:
> As with Diez, I simply ask, "How do I get around the problem?" Are you two
> telling me that it is impossible?
YES. That's what we and all the others who answered to you in the other
thread are telling you, repeatedly. It is impossible. Really. No kidding.
For sure. Jawoll, ga
W. eWatson wrote:
As with Diez, I simply ask, "How do I get around the problem?" Are you
two telling me that it is impossible?
OK, here's my offer to both of you. Do you have IDLE for Python 2.5 and
have good familiarity with Tkinter? If so, I'll send you the code and
you can try it yourself
As with Diez, I simply ask, "How do I get around the problem?" Are you two
telling me that it is impossible?
OK, here's my offer to both of you. Do you have IDLE for Python 2.5 and have
good familiarity with Tkinter? If so, I'll send you the code and you can
try it yourself. My guess is that
I simply ask, "How do I get around the problem?"
--
W. eWatson
(121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time)
Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet
Web Page:
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listin
On Feb 12, 8:57 am, "W. eWatson" wrote:
> Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
> > W. eWatson wrote:
>
> >> It appears if one moves between IDLE and pythonWin (pyWin) that two
> >> separate loops (threads?) can occur, and that IDLE can produce incorrect
> >> results. Since I have preferred IDLE over pyWin, tha
> Done that. Been there. It doesn't work. If I take another py tkinter
> program and run it in IDLE, it *will work*. The current program goes boom.
That's pure luck then. IDLE is written in Tkinter, and *running* Tkinter
apps inside of it is bound to fail sooner or later. Failure might be as
drast
Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
W. eWatson wrote:
It appears if one moves between IDLE and pythonWin (pyWin) that two
separate loops (threads?) can occur, and that IDLE can produce incorrect
results. Since I have preferred IDLE over pyWin, that leaves me currently
in a quandry. How do I renew these pro
W. eWatson wrote:
> It appears if one moves between IDLE and pythonWin (pyWin) that two
> separate loops (threads?) can occur, and that IDLE can produce incorrect
> results. Since I have preferred IDLE over pyWin, that leaves me currently
> in a quandry. How do I renew these processes, so that I c
24 matches
Mail list logo
