Michael Torrie writes:
> On 12/12/19 6:33 PM, Python wrote:
> > What happened exactly? Did you download the official installer from
> > python.org, then click on next, next, next, checking the box (if it's
> > still there about updating PATH)? There is nothing more to do.
>
> I've seen github bug
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 06:40:32PM -0600, catherine morris wrote:
> Good evening,
>
> My son is trying to download python 3.8.0 on my PC, which has Windows 10,
> and it won't install properly. I'm not tech savvy and have no idea where to
> start.
No offense, but, how old is your son ?
Karsten
--
On 12/12/19 8:03 PM, Python wrote:
>> Just when I think Windows 10 is a pretty decent system, I encounter
>> something inexplicable like this.
>
> We've gone through that before, haven't we?
Yup, Several times. The good news is her son finally got it installed
by launching the installer from exp
Le 13/12/2019 à 03:53, Michael Torrie a écrit :
On 12/12/19 6:33 PM, Python wrote:
catherine morris wrote:
Good evening,
My son is trying to download python 3.8.0 on my PC, which has Windows 10,
and it won't install properly. I'm not tech savvy and have no idea where to
start.
What happened
On 12/12/19 6:33 PM, Python wrote:
> catherine morris wrote:
>> Good evening,
>>
>> My son is trying to download python 3.8.0 on my PC, which has Windows 10,
>> and it won't install properly. I'm not tech savvy and have no idea where to
>> start.
>
> What happened exactly? Did you download the off
catherine morris wrote:
Good evening,
My son is trying to download python 3.8.0 on my PC, which has Windows 10,
and it won't install properly. I'm not tech savvy and have no idea where to
start.
What happened exactly? Did you download the official installer from
python.org, then click on next,
On 12/12/19 5:40 PM, catherine morris wrote:
> Good evening,
>
> My son is trying to download python 3.8.0 on my PC, which has Windows 10,
> and it won't install properly. I'm not tech savvy and have no idea where to
> start.
>
> Catherine Morris
I just learned today that Python is officially av
On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 02:03 am, Sk. Amirul Islam wrote:
> i recently installed the application but when i ran it it gave a 'runtime
> error". i even reinstalled it. but it gives the same error everytime i
> try. im eclosing a screenshot of the error . thank you
Hi. Which application are you talking
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Sk. Amirul Islam wrote:
> i recently installed the application but when i ran it it gave a 'runtime
> error". i even reinstalled it. but it gives the same error everytime i try.
> im eclosing a screenshot of the error . thank you
Attachments are not going thr
Thanks for the thoughts - much appreciated! The threaded super-goat
was indeed the offender. A very aggressive QA tester got us enough of
a pattern to identify the offending module: pyOpenSSL. After looking
at it closely, we found there are problems with its thread handling.
In particular, the G
(Dave) wrote:
8<- description of horrible problem --
Faced with this, I would:
1 - identify the modules that import gc to separate the
sheep from the goats.
2 - do my best to change gc importing goats back to sheep.
3 - amongst the remaining goats, identify the ones
On Nov 17, 10:34 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi folks - wondering if anyone has any pointers on troubleshooting
> garbage collection. My colleagues and I are running into an
> interesting problem:
>
> Intermittently, we get into a situation where the garbage collection
> c
On Sep 13, 8:10 pm, "Gheorghe Postelnicu"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have Python 2.5 installed on WinXP and I am trying to install a new
> package. I ran thesetup.pybuild and I get the following message:
>
> C:\packages\reedsolomon-0.1>setup.pybuild
> running build
> running build_ext
>
Steven Bethard wrote:
first, iterable = peek(iterable)
I really like this as a general solution to a problem that bothers me
occasionally. IMHO it's much better than having UndoFiles or similar
things lying about for every use case.
Thanks!
--
Michael Hoffman
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/li
Nick Coghlan wrote:
Nick Coghlan wrote:
Chris Lasher wrote:
Hello,
I really like the finditer() method of the re module. I'm having
difficulty at the moment, however, because finditer() still creates a
callable-iterator oject, even when no match is found. This is
undesirable in cases where I would
Nick Coghlan wrote:
Chris Lasher wrote:
Hello,
I really like the finditer() method of the re module. I'm having
difficulty at the moment, however, because finditer() still creates a
callable-iterator oject, even when no match is found. This is
undesirable in cases where I would like to circumvent e
Chris Lasher wrote:
Hello,
I really like the finditer() method of the re module. I'm having
difficulty at the moment, however, because finditer() still creates a
callable-iterator oject, even when no match is found. This is
undesirable in cases where I would like to circumvent execution of code
mea
Chris Lasher wrote:
> That's odd that there's no built-in method to do this. It seems like
> it would be a common task.
if you do this a lot, maybe you shouldn't use finditer? iterators are
designed to give you the next item (if any) when you're ready to deal
with it... if that's not what you w
Chris Lasher wrote:
Is there any way to request a feature like
this from the RE module keepers, whomever they may be?
The most direct way would be to go to Python at sourceforge[1] and make
a feature request to add peek to itertools. (This is probably the most
reasonable location for it.) Reque
Chris Lasher wrote:
> That's odd that there's no built-in method to do this. It seems like
> it would be a common task. Is there any way to request a feature like
> this from the RE module keepers, whomever they may be?
The best way to request such a feature would be to write a patch. ;)
FuManCh
Thanks Steve,
That's odd that there's no built-in method to do this. It seems like
it would be a common task. Is there any way to request a feature like
this from the RE module keepers, whomever they may be?
In the meantime, may I use your code, with accredation to you?
Thanks,
Chris
--
http://ma
Chris Lasher wrote:
I know that if I place a finditer() object in an iterative for loop,
the loop will not execute, but is there some way I can test to see if
the object contains no matches in the first place?
Basically, you want to peek into an interable. See my recipes:
http://aspn.activestate.c
22 matches
Mail list logo
