Re: Traceback in Logging

2009-01-08 Thread Kottiyath
The issue is that I am on Python 2.4 which doesnt support func name. I am using filename and lineno now. That does serve the purpose. Thank you, I had not checked all the parameters. Regards K Vinay Sajip wrote: > On Jan 6, 4:17 pm, Kottiyath wrote: > > I dont want the whole traceback. I just wa

Re: Traceback in Logging

2009-01-07 Thread Vinay Sajip
On Jan 6, 10:19 pm, Thorsten Kampe wrote: > I don't think he's interested in the "line number where the logging call > was issued" but where the exception occurred. Well, he does say "all logging" and "every logging". And, as I mentioned earlier, there is already support for tracebacks by using t

Re: Traceback in Logging

2009-01-06 Thread Thorsten Kampe
* Vinay Sajip (Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:24:54 -0800 (PST)) > On Jan 6, 4:17 pm, Kottiyath wrote: > > I dont want the whole traceback. I just wanted to know where the log > > was generated from i.e. which procedure and which line. I have 3/4 > > points in many procedures where I encounter a small error (

Re: Traceback in Logging

2009-01-06 Thread Vinay Sajip
On Jan 6, 4:17 pm, Kottiyath wrote: > I dont want the whole traceback. I just wanted to know where the log > was generated from i.e. which procedure and which line. I have 3/4 > points in many procedures where I encounter a small error (not an > exception) and want to log it. So having individual

Re: Traceback in Logging

2009-01-06 Thread skip
Kottiyath> I dont want the whole traceback. I just wanted to know where Kottiyath> the log was generated from i.e. which procedure and which Kottiyath> line. The asyncore standard module has an undocumented compact_traceback() function: #!/usr/bin/env python import asyncore

Re: Traceback in Logging

2009-01-06 Thread Kottiyath
I dont want the whole traceback. I just wanted to know where the log was generated from i.e. which procedure and which line. I have 3/4 points in many procedures where I encounter a small error (not an exception) and want to log it. So having individual names for each looks to be somewhat verbose -

Re: Traceback in Logging

2009-01-06 Thread Vinay Sajip
On Jan 6, 1:33 pm, Kottiyath wrote: > This seems somewhat kludgy. Is it possible in logging mechanism itself > to provide traceback as default? > No, because it's not a common use case to print tracebacks for every logging call. There's support for adding traceback information in exception handli