On 12/14/2010 11:52 PM, JohnWShipman wrote:
> you
> know how us ancient Unix weenies are.
Indeed we do ... ;-)
regards
Steve
--
Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119
PyCon 2011 Atlanta March 9-17 http://us.pycon.org/
See Python Video! http://python.mirocommunity.o
On Dec 14, 8:57 am, "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 07:35:45 -0800 (PST)
>
> baloan wrote:
> > Unfortunately you use command('cp...') to copy the file instead of
> > Pythons portable library methods. This choice
> > effectively makes your program work on Unix only (not Windows).
>
On Dec 14, 8:57 am, "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 07:35:45 -0800 (PST)
>
> baloan wrote:
> > Unfortunately you use command('cp...') to copy the file instead of
> > Pythons portable library methods. This choice
> > effectively makes your program work on Unix only (not Windows).
>
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:25:54 + (UTC)
Harishankar wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:57:40 -0500, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> > open(out_fn, 'w').write(open(in_fn).read())
> Or what about shutil? Isn't that the higher level file operation module?
At least that's in the standard library but even t
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:57:40 -0500, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> I guess I missed the beginning of this thread but can someone tell me
> why one needs to download a whole other program in order to do this?
>
> open(out_fn, 'w').write(open(in_fn).read())
Or what about shutil? Isn't that the higher
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 07:35:45 -0800 (PST)
baloan wrote:
> Unfortunately you use command('cp...') to copy the file instead of
> Pythons portable library methods. This choice
> effectively makes your program work on Unix only (not Windows).
>
> See http://modcopy.sourceforge.net for a more portable
Unfortunately you use command('cp...') to copy the file instead of
Pythons portable library methods. This choice
effectively makes your program work on Unix only (not Windows).
See http://modcopy.sourceforge.net for a more portable version.
Regards,
bal...@gmail.com
--
http://mail.python.org/mai