On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:18 AM, wrote:
> The second argument takes the tuple which determines which varialble(key) to
> use the comparator on. And the third determines whether to return the list in
> ascending or descending order.
That's not exactly correct. The arguments are listed in that
On Sunday, June 16, 2013 1:33:17 PM UTC-7, Ian wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 10:05 PM, wrote:
>
> > Yes I've read it. Very interesting read. There are other resources too
> > online that make it very clear, for instance the wikipedia articles is
> > pretty good.
>
> >
>
> > Though, if any
On Sunday, June 16, 2013 1:16:02 PM UTC-7, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 09:15:11 -0700 (PDT), alphons...@gmail.com declaimed
>
> the following:
>
>
>
> >sorry about that. I'm new to google groups. I'm trying to make sense of
> >python's implementation of timsort through cpyth
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 10:05 PM, wrote:
> Yes I've read it. Very interesting read. There are other resources too online
> that make it very clear, for instance the wikipedia articles is pretty good.
>
> Though, if anyone would be interested in helping me out further -- though by
> all means, I
sorry about that. I'm new to google groups. I'm trying to make sense of
python's implementation of timsort through cpython:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/default/Objects/listobject.c
I was replying to Terry Jan Reedy
>
> http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/default/Objects/listsort.txt
>
> is
Answer: The lost context.
Question: What makes top-posted replies harder to read than bottom-posted?
alphons...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes I've read it. Very interesting read. There are other resources too online
that make it very clear, for instance the wikipedia articles is pretty good.
Though,
Yes I've read it. Very interesting read. There are other resources too online
that make it very clear, for instance the wikipedia articles is pretty good.
Though, if anyone would be interested in helping me out further -- though by
all means, I'm not lazy, I can figure it myself. But, I wanted t
On 6/15/2013 4:21 PM, alphons...@gmail.com wrote:
Well. I'm going to have a ton of fun trying to make sense of this.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/default/Objects/listsort.txt
is pretty clear (to me) for most of the basics.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/p
Ahh, that makes perfect sense. Thanks for clearing that up.
On Saturday, June 15, 2013 1:55:29 PM UTC-7, Robert Kern wrote:
> On 2013-06-15 21:21, alphons...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Hey guys,
>
> > Thanks for the quick reply! So why did they decide to call it listsort in
> > the source instead?
On 2013-06-15 21:21, alphons...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys,
Thanks for the quick reply! So why did they decide to call it listsort in the
source instead? Why didn't they keep it as Timsort?
This was the first implementation of the algorithm. The algorithm was only
colloquially named "Timsort"
Hey guys,
Thanks for the quick reply! So why did they decide to call it listsort in the
source instead? Why didn't they keep it as Timsort?
Well. I'm going to have a ton of fun trying to make sense of this.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2013-06-15 20:44, alphons...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm currently trying to make sense of Python's Timsort function. From the
wikipedia page I was told the algorithm is located somewhere here:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/default/Objects/listobject.c
So of all the functions in there, could s
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 2:44 PM, wrote:
> I'm currently trying to make sense of Python's Timsort function. From the
> wikipedia page I was told the algorithm is located somewhere here:
> http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/default/Objects/listobject.c
>
> So of all the functions in there, could s
13 matches
Mail list logo
